Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Saugus Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Belmonte Saugus Middle

Organization Information

District:

Saugus (02620000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Belmonte Saugus Middle (02620305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.3	87.5	87.9	0.4	92.6	93.7	39	625	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		77.6	79.6	78.9	-0.7	86.9	88.8	42	236	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.4	83.4	84.5	1.1	84.8	91.7	54	166	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		60.2	66.4	67.4	1.0	76.8	80.1	45	85	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		82.1	-	-	-	-	91.1	-	28	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		87.7	81.1	79.9	-1.2	92.8	93.9	40	61	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		87.8	88.1	89.2	1.1	92.9	93.9	32	507	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.2	75.3	75.0	-0.3	84.4	86.6	35	625	25	No Change
High needs		63.1	63.3	61.7	-1.6	78.5	81.6	44	235	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.8	67.8	66.4	-1.4	70.5	83.9	44	165	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		38.9	45.3	43.9	-1.4	64.4	69.5	28	86	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		71.4	-	-	-	-	85.7	-	28	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.4	66.4	62.9	-3.5	83.9	86.2	41	62	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		73.4	75.9	76.8	0.9	84.5	86.7	28	506	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.8	72.7	65.4	-7.3	77.7	80.9	25	209	0	Declined
High needs		51.1	58.7	56.9	-1.8	71.5	75.6	31	80	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		62.7	62.7	59.0	-3.7	65.8	81.4	35	64	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		36.5	44.0	38.5	-5.5	63.0	68.3	13	24	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		63.0	-	-	-	-	81.5	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		62.9	73.5	66.9	-6.6	78.4	81.5	12	163	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.3	8.3	625	0	5.6	5.0	625	25
High needs	4.7	5.5	236	25	12.8	9.7	236	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.9	7.2	166	25	9.6	4.8	166	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.0	1.2	85	25	27.1	17.6	85	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	28	-	-	-	28	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.3	1.6	61	0	9.8	6.6	61	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	9.3	9.7	507	0	5.5	4.3	507	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.2	17.3	625	25	16.4	16.3	625	0
High needs	6.2	7.7	235	25	30.4	30.2	235	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.4	10.3	165	25	23.4	23.0	165	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.1	0.0	86	0	55.2	57.0	86	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Asian	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	28	-	-	-	28	-
Hispanic/Latino	9.8	4.8	62	0	29.5	32.3	62	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	14.4	18.8	506	25	15.2	13.8	506	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.7	0.5	209	0	15.2	20.6	209	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	80	0	29.5	31.3	80	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	64	0	21.1	28.1	64	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	24	0	58.6	54.2	24	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2.0	0.6	163	0	14.3	17.8	163	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	47.5	1.5	51.0	No	612	50	Below Target
High needs		41.0	48.0	7.0	51.0	No	225	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		40.0	50.0	10.0	51.0	No	162	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		41.5	46.5	5.0	51.0	No	76	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	25	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		45.0	51.0	6.0	51.0	No	60	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		45.0	46.0	1.0	51.0	No	498	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.0	44.0	11.0	51.0	No	613	75	On Target
High needs		30.0	43.0	13.0	51.0	No	226	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		27.0	42.0	15.0	51.0	No	163	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		29.0	43.0	14.0	51.0	No	77	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		33.0	41.0	8.0	51.0	No	61	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
White		34.0	44.0	10.0	51.0	No	498	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	5.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	5.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	5.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	658	644	98	Yes	658	652	99	Yes	220	219	100	Yes
High needs	255	244	96	Yes	255	251	98	Yes	86	86	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	178	170	96	Yes	178	174	98	Yes	68	68	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	32	-	-	-	32	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	90	88	98	Yes	90	89	99	Yes	26	26	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	31	29	94	No	31	31	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	76	73	96	Yes	76	74	97	Yes	26	26	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	520	513	99	Yes	520	516	99	Yes	168	167	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.