Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Carlton

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Carlton

Organization Information
District:Salem (02580000)School type:Elementary School
School:Carlton (02580015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.8, Target = 82.7CPI = 86.8, Target = 82.7CPI = 86.8, Target = 82.7 70.4 81.6 86.8 5.2 82.7 85.2 5691100Above Target
High needsCPI = 83.1, Target = 79.9CPI = 83.1, Target = 79.9CPI = 83.1, Target = 79.9 65.5 78.3 83.1 4.8 79.9 82.8 8262100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.9, Target = 81.1CPI = 83.9, Target = 81.1CPI = 83.9, Target = 81.1 79.4 79.4 83.9 4.5 81.1 89.7 8356100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65, Target = 71.2CPI = 65, Target = 71.2CPI = 65, Target = 71.2 50.6 61.6 65.0 3.4 71.2 75.3 522550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.5, Target = 84.3CPI = 90.5, Target = 84.3CPI = 90.5, Target = 84.3 73.0 88.7 90.5 1.8 84.3 86.5 6458100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.5, Target = 80.5CPI = 83.5, Target = 80.5CPI = 83.5, Target = 80.5 66.6 82.7 83.5 0.8 80.5 83.3 4191100Above Target
High needsCPI = 78.2, Target = 78.3CPI = 78.2, Target = 78.3 62.8 78.5 78.2 -0.3 78.3 81.4 606275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.5, Target = 79.6CPI = 79.5, Target = 79.6 77.7 77.7 79.5 1.8 79.6 88.9 655675On Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63, Target = 67.9CPI = 63, Target = 67.9CPI = 63, Target = 67.9 44.9 67.2 63.0 -4.2 67.9 72.5 46250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.9, Target = 83.8CPI = 87.9, Target = 83.8CPI = 87.9, Target = 83.8 72.3 86.6 87.9 1.3 83.8 86.2 5058100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.6, Target = 79.9CPI = 80.6, Target = 79.9 65.5 69.7 80.6 10.9 79.9 82.8 493175On Target
High needsCPI = 73.8, Target = 75.9CPI = 73.8, Target = 75.9CPI = 73.8, Target = 75.9 58.7- 73.8 12.5 75.9 79.4 712050Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  75.0---- 87.5-20--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 9.5 19.89125 7.4 5.59125
High needs 5.8 9.76225 10.1 8.16225
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.5 10.75625 9.7 7.15625
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.02525 25.0 20.02525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.2 24.15825 1.9 5.2580
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 23.7 31.99125 10.3 6.69125
High needs 18.3 24.26225 14.1 9.76225
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.3 23.25625 14.1 7.15625
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 6.9 16.02525 27.6 20.02525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.8 34.55825 9.3 1.75825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 0.0 6.53125 21.2 6.53125
High needs 9.7 0.0200 25.8 10.02025
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--20---20-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 57.0 59.0 2.0 51.0Yes5875On Target
High needsSGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51 61.0 58.5 -2.5 51.0Yes3875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51 61.0 58.5 -2.5 51.0Yes3475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51 59.0 71.5 12.5 51.0Yes36100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 43.0 34.5 -8.5 51.0No5825Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 50.0 34.0 -16.0 51.0No3825Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 49.0 32.5 -16.5 51.0No3425Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 36.0 34.0 -2.0 51.0No3625Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students1009999Yes100100100Yes3434100Yes
High needs706999Yes7070100Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged646398Yes6464100Yes21---
EL and Former EL13---13---8---
Students w/ disabilities292897Yes2929100Yes7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---4---
Hispanic/Latino25---25---10---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White616098Yes6161100Yes2020100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles