Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Rockport Middle
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Rockport Middle
Organization Information
District:Rockport (02520000)School type:Middle School
School:Rockport Middle (02520305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.1, Target = 97CPI = 96.1, Target = 97 94.8 96.5 96.1 -0.4 97.0 97.4 8723075On Target
High needsCPI = 90, Target = 91.4CPI = 90, Target = 91.4CPI = 90, Target = 91.4 85.3 92.5 90.0 -2.5 91.4 92.7 946575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 92.4, Target = 95.1CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.1CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.1 94.7 94.7 92.4 -2.3 95.1 97.4 923675On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 87.2, Target = 88.7CPI = 87.2, Target = 88.7CPI = 87.2, Target = 88.7 80.6 88.9 87.2 -1.7 88.7 90.3 933975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.2, Target = 96.9CPI = 96.2, Target = 96.9 94.7 96.9 96.2 -0.7 96.9 97.4 8321375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.5, Target = 92.1CPI = 85.5, Target = 92.1CPI = 85.5, Target = 92.1 86.4 81.5 85.5 4.0 92.1 93.2 7222950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.5, Target = 81.5CPI = 66.5, Target = 81.5CPI = 66.5, Target = 81.5 68.3 66.6 66.5 -0.1 81.5 84.2 646525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.3, Target = 75.6CPI = 74.3, Target = 75.6CPI = 74.3, Target = 75.6 73.4 73.4 74.3 0.9 75.6 86.7 753650Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.3, Target = 76.3CPI = 58.3, Target = 76.3CPI = 58.3, Target = 76.3 59.4 56.7 58.3 1.6 76.3 79.7 763950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86, Target = 92.2CPI = 86, Target = 92.2CPI = 86, Target = 92.2 86.6 81.4 86.0 4.6 92.2 93.3 6821250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 83.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 83.2, Target = 92.6 87.3 81.4 83.2 1.8 92.6 93.7 797650Improved Below Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.5, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.5, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.5, Target = 92.8 87.7 81.0 83.5 2.5 92.8 93.9 757175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.1 29.623025 0.4 1.32300
High needs 10.0 12.36525 1.3 4.6650
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.0 19.43625 2.1 2.8360
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.63925 2.2 5.1390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.9 30.521325 0.4 1.42130
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.0 33.622925 10.5 9.222925
High needs 17.5 10.8650 22.5 23.1650
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.5 16.7360 12.8 16.7360
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 4.4 2.6390 33.3 33.3390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.9 33.021225 11.3 9.021225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.4 13.27625 3.3 7.9760
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 3.4 14.17125 3.4 8.5710
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 72.0 54.0 -18.0 51.0No22375On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 74.0 49.0 -25.0 51.0No6350Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 74.0 49.0 -25.0 51.0No3550Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 72.0 46.0 -26.0 51.0No3750Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 71.0 54.0 -17.0 51.0No20975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 68.0 54.5 -13.5 51.0Yes22075On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 64.5 43.0 -21.5 51.0No6350Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 66.0 43.0 -23.0 51.0No3550Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 60.0 47.0 -13.0 51.0No3750Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 67.0 54.5 -12.5 51.0Yes20675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students23523299Yes23523198Yes787799Yes
High needs676699Yes676699Yes20---
Econ. Disadvantaged3636100Yes3636100Yes7---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities414098Yes414098Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---2---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White21721599Yes21721499Yes737299Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles