Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Rockport Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Rockport Elementary
Organization Information
District:Rockport (02520000)School type:Elementary School
School:Rockport Elementary (02520005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.5, Target = 94.3CPI = 88.5, Target = 94.3CPI = 88.5, Target = 94.3 90.3 93.8 88.5 -5.3 94.3 95.2 642060Declined
High needsCPI = 79.6, Target = 88.9CPI = 79.6, Target = 88.9CPI = 79.6, Target = 88.9 81.0 86.8 79.6 -7.2 88.9 90.5 69710Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.2, Target = 90.1CPI = 83.2, Target = 90.1CPI = 83.2, Target = 90.1 89.2 89.2 83.2 -6.0 90.1 94.6 80460Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.2, Target = 87.4CPI = 68.2, Target = 87.4CPI = 68.2, Target = 87.4 78.4 78.8 68.2 -10.6 87.4 89.2 61330Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.7, Target = 94.7CPI = 88.7, Target = 94.7CPI = 88.7, Target = 94.7 90.9 94.1 88.7 -5.4 94.7 95.5 521940Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.1, Target = 91.9CPI = 83.1, Target = 91.9CPI = 83.1, Target = 91.9 86.1 84.7 83.1 -1.6 91.9 93.1 3920625No Change
High needsCPI = 70, Target = 87.2CPI = 70, Target = 87.2CPI = 70, Target = 87.2 78.0 72.1 70.0 -2.1 87.2 89.0 257025No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.4, Target = 76.4CPI = 69.4, Target = 76.4CPI = 69.4, Target = 76.4 74.3 74.3 69.4 -4.9 76.4 87.2 23450Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.6, Target = 87.9CPI = 60.6, Target = 87.9CPI = 60.6, Target = 87.9 79.3 67.0 60.6 -6.4 87.9 89.7 38330Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.4, Target = 91.8CPI = 83.4, Target = 91.8CPI = 83.4, Target = 91.8 86.0 84.9 83.4 -1.5 91.8 93.0 2719425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.7, Target = 93.4CPI = 82.7, Target = 93.4CPI = 82.7, Target = 93.4 88.7 84.6 82.7 -1.9 93.4 94.4 567125No Change
High needs  64.8---- 82.4-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.1, Target = 93.6CPI = 83.1, Target = 93.6CPI = 83.1, Target = 93.6 89.0 85.5 83.1 -2.4 93.6 94.5 406825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.7 15.02060 1.0 3.42060
High needs 9.4 7.0710 1.9 5.6710
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.8 10.9460 2.7 6.5460
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 0.0330 3.8 12.1330
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 20.7 15.51940 1.1 3.61940
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 25.4 26.72060 4.2 6.82060
High needs 9.6 21.47025 11.5 15.7700
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 22.24525 8.3 17.8450
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 8.0 15.23325 16.0 24.2330
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.1 27.31940 4.3 6.21940
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.5 19.7710 4.6 9.9710
High needs--22---22-
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.9 19.1680 3.1 8.8680
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 57.0 44.0 -13.0 51.0No13150Below Target
High needsSGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51 49.5 27.5 -22.0 51.0No380Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 57.0 43.0 -14.0 51.0No12750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 43.0 42.0 -1.0 51.0No12950Below Target
High needsSGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51SGP = 26, Target = 51 28.0 26.0 -2.0 51.0No360Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 45.0 42.0 -3.0 51.0No12550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students21120899Yes21120899Yes7171100Yes
High needs7373100Yes737299Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4848100Yes484798Yes16---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities3333100Yes3333100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino5---5---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19819598Yes19819598Yes6868100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles