Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Rochester Memorial
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Rochester Memorial
Organization Information
District:Rochester (02500000)School type:Elementary School
School:Rochester Memorial (02500005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.4, Target = 94.3CPI = 91.4, Target = 94.3CPI = 91.4, Target = 94.3 90.3 90.3 91.4 1.1 94.3 95.2 7627150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 85.7, Target = 86.1CPI = 85.7, Target = 86.1 76.1 80.7 85.7 5.0 86.1 88.1 897575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.6, Target = 85.1CPI = 88.6, Target = 85.1CPI = 88.6, Target = 85.1 83.7 83.7 88.6 4.9 85.1 91.9 9435100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 84.5, Target = 83.9CPI = 84.5, Target = 83.9 72.4 74.1 84.5 10.4 83.9 86.2 945075On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 94.8CPI = 92, Target = 94.8CPI = 92, Target = 94.8 91.0 91.2 92.0 0.8 94.8 95.5 7224550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.9, Target = 92.2CPI = 89.9, Target = 92.2CPI = 89.9, Target = 92.2 86.7 88.3 89.9 1.6 92.2 93.4 7026950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.4, Target = 84.8CPI = 80.4, Target = 84.8CPI = 80.4, Target = 84.8 73.9 78.8 80.4 1.6 84.8 87.0 707450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85, Target = 83.3CPI = 85, Target = 83.3CPI = 85, Target = 83.3 81.8 81.8 85.0 3.2 83.3 90.9 8535100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.5, Target = 83.6CPI = 75.5, Target = 83.6CPI = 75.5, Target = 83.6 71.9 73.7 75.5 1.8 83.6 86.0 784950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.3, Target = 92.9CPI = 91.3, Target = 92.9CPI = 91.3, Target = 92.9 87.9 89.2 91.3 2.1 92.9 94.0 7124350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.3, Target = 92.5CPI = 83.3, Target = 92.5CPI = 83.3, Target = 92.5 87.2 88.0 83.3 -4.7 92.5 93.6 58660Declined
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 81.9CPI = 73.9, Target = 81.9CPI = 73.9, Target = 81.9 72.9 80.0 73.9 -6.1 81.9 86.5 72220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.6, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.6, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.6, Target = 92.8 87.7 89.6 83.6 -6.0 92.8 93.9 43640Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.8 14.82710 2.1 0.727125
High needs 7.6 4.0750 5.4 1.37525
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.2 8.6350 6.1 0.03525
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 0.0500 8.9 2.05025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--16---16-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.7 15.52450 1.5 0.424525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.4 34.926925 3.2 3.02690
High needs 15.4 18.97425 7.7 5.47425
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.8 28.63525 6.3 5.7350
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 10.24925 8.9 8.2490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--16---16-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.4 36.624325 2.7 2.124325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.6 10.6660 2.6 6.1660
High needs 12.0 0.0220 8.0 13.6220
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.1 9.4640 2.9 6.3640
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 64.0 62.0 -2.0 51.0No193100Above Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 61.5 50.0 -11.5 51.0No5050Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 60.0 53.0 -7.0 51.0Yes3175On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 64.0 61.0 -3.0 51.0No178100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 75.0 68.0 -7.0 51.0No191100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 75.0 61.5 -13.5 51.0No50100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 73.0 64.0 -9.0 51.0No31100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 75.5 68.0 -7.5 51.0Yes176100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students27627198Yes27626997Yes676699Yes
High needs787596Yes787495Yes232296Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged373595Yes373595Yes10---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities515098Yes514996Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---1---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.16---16---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White24824599Yes24824398Yes6464100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles