Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Walter S Parker Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Walter S Parker Middle

Organization Information

District:

Reading (02460000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Walter S Parker Middle (02460310)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.4	95.5	95.4	-0.1	97.9	98.2	84	535	75	On Target
High needs		88.9	85.8	85.3	-0.5	93.5	94.5	78	126	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		88.3	88.3	87.3	-1.0	89.3	94.2	73	55	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		87.7	80.8	81.7	0.9	92.8	93.9	85	93	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian		96.4	99.0	96.3	-2.7	97.9	98.2	51	27	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.6	95.6	95.8	0.2	98.0	98.3	82	484	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.4	88.1	88.9	0.8	94.4	95.2	85	536	75	On Target
High needs		73.3	68.8	68.8	0.0	84.4	86.7	73	125	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.4	71.4	73.2	1.8	73.8	85.7	71	55	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		71.0	62.3	62.2	-0.1	83.1	85.5	84	92	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		92.0	90.0	92.6	2.6	95.3	96.0	46	27	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.7	88.8	89.6	0.8	94.6	95.4	83	485	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.9	83.2	84.1	0.9	90.0	91.5	82	181	75	On Target
High needs		69.0	63.4	64.2	0.8	81.9	84.5	67	53	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.7	59.6	58.3	-1.3	79.4	82.4	73	42	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.3	84.6	83.5	-1.1	89.7	91.2	75	164	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.1	28.2	535	25	1.4	2.4	535	0
High needs	6.8	6.3	126	0	4.7	8.7	126	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.8	7.3	55	0	6.3	7.3	55	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.7	4.3	93	0	6.5	10.8	93	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Asian	24.0	40.7	27	25	0.0	3.7	27	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	25.1	28.5	484	25	1.3	2.1	484	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	33.9	38.1	536	25	7.0	6.2	536	25
High needs	10.4	15.2	125	25	22.2	21.6	125	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.5	23.6	55	25	24.2	18.2	55	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.8	7.6	92	25	28.8	27.2	92	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	56.0	51.9	27	0	8.0	3.7	27	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	33.8	38.8	485	25	6.0	5.4	485	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.9	8.3	181	25	7.2	5.0	181	25
High needs	0.0	3.8	53	25	24.1	17.0	53	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.4	42	25	28.2	21.4	42	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.6	6.7	164	25	5.2	5.5	164	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		62.0	56.0	-6.0	51.0	No	530	75	On Target
High needs		54.0	50.5	-3.5	51.0	No	126	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		55.5	50.0	-5.5	51.0	No	55	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.0	51.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	93	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		62.0	57.0	-5.0	51.0	Yes	479	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		56.0	56.0	0.0	51.0	No	526	75	On Target
High needs		51.0	45.0	-6.0	51.0	No	121	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.5	57.0	6.5	51.0	No	53	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		49.0	40.0	-9.0	51.0	No	89	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		54.0	58.0	4.0	51.0	No	476	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	551	538	98	Yes	552	539	98	Yes	184	183	99	Yes
High needs	129	127	98	Yes	130	126	97	Yes	54	54	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	55	55	100	Yes	56	55	98	Yes	17	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	95	93	98	Yes	96	92	96	Yes	42	42	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	28	28	100	Yes	28	28	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	496	485	98	Yes	497	486	98	Yes	166	165	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.