Massachusetts School and District Profiles

J Warren Killam
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - J Warren Killam
Organization Information
District:Reading (02460000)School type:Elementary School
School:J Warren Killam (02460017)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.2, Target = 94.6CPI = 89.2, Target = 94.6CPI = 89.2, Target = 94.6 90.8 86.0 89.2 3.2 94.6 95.4 6723950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.8, Target = 86.2CPI = 77.8, Target = 86.2CPI = 77.8, Target = 86.2 76.4 69.6 77.8 8.2 86.2 88.2 616350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.1, Target = 77.1CPI = 82.1, Target = 77.1CPI = 82.1, Target = 77.1 75.0 75.0 82.1 7.1 77.1 87.5 7528100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.8, Target = 85.8CPI = 70.8, Target = 85.8CPI = 70.8, Target = 85.8 75.7 57.3 70.8 13.5 85.8 87.9 673650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 89.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.9 91.3 87.0 89.7 2.7 94.9 95.7 6020850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.3, Target = 94.2CPI = 90.3, Target = 94.2CPI = 90.3, Target = 94.2 90.1 86.6 90.3 3.7 94.2 95.1 7223950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79, Target = 88.2CPI = 79, Target = 88.2CPI = 79, Target = 88.2 79.8 72.8 79.0 6.2 88.2 89.9 646350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83, Target = 79.4CPI = 83, Target = 79.4CPI = 83, Target = 79.4 77.5 77.5 83.0 5.5 79.4 88.8 7828100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.6, Target = 87.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 87.5CPI = 73.6, Target = 87.5 78.5 62.1 73.6 11.5 87.5 89.3 743650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 94.5CPI = 91, Target = 94.5CPI = 91, Target = 94.5 90.5 87.3 91.0 3.7 94.5 95.3 6920850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.5, Target = 94.1CPI = 79.5, Target = 94.1CPI = 79.5, Target = 94.1 89.9 85.1 79.5 -5.6 94.1 95.0 45880Declined
High needs  81.0---- 90.5-26--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.1, Target = 94.1CPI = 81.1, Target = 94.1CPI = 81.1, Target = 94.1 89.9 87.9 81.1 -6.8 94.1 95.0 31740Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.3 22.223925 6.0 3.823925
High needs 3.6 7.96325 19.6 9.56325
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.3 7.12825 13.3 10.72825
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 5.63625 35.5 11.13625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 14.8 23.620825 5.3 3.420825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.3 35.123925 5.0 2.523925
High needs 8.9 14.36325 14.3 9.56325
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.0 17.92825 16.7 7.12825
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 8.33625 19.4 13.93625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 25.9 38.020825 3.2 2.420825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.1 18.28825 6.5 9.1880
High needs--26---26-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.9 20.37425 3.6 8.1740
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 46.5 61.5 15.0 51.0Yes160100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 37.5 56.0 18.5 51.0Yes42100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 31.5 58.0 26.5 51.0Yes25100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 47.0 63.0 16.0 51.0Yes134100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 47.0 52.0 5.0 51.0Yes16075On Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 42.5 48.0 5.5 51.0Yes4275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 38.5 36.0 -2.5 51.0Yes2575On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 46.5 50.0 3.5 51.0Yes13475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students239239100Yes239239100Yes8888100Yes
High needs6363100Yes6363100Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2828100Yes2828100Yes8---
EL and Former EL9---9---2---
Students w/ disabilities3636100Yes3636100Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian15---15---9---
Afr. Amer./Black11---11---3---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White208208100Yes208208100Yes7474100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles