Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joshua Eaton

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joshua Eaton

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.5, Target = 95.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.5, Target = 95.2 75 or Higher All Students 91.7 88.3 85.5 -2.8 95.2 95.9 492530Declined
High needsCPI = 67, Target = 85.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 67, Target = 85.4 75 or Higher High needs 75.0 67.3 67.0 -0.3 85.4 87.5 155625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.4, Target = 82.2 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 54.4, Target = 82.2 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 69.4 52.5 54.4 1.9 82.2 84.7 233450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.9, Target = 95.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 87.9, Target = 95.2 75 or Higher White 91.8 88.9 87.9 -1.0 95.2 95.9 4921025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.1, Target = 94.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 87.1, Target = 94.6 75 or Higher All Students 90.7 88.2 87.1 -1.1 94.6 95.4 5725225No Change
High needsCPI = 62.1, Target = 84.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 62.1, Target = 84.1 75 or Higher High needs 72.8 68.6 62.1 -6.5 84.1 86.4 7560Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 46.3, Target = 80.9 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 46.3, Target = 80.9 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 67.3 55.8 46.3 -9.5 80.9 83.7 10340Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.2, Target = 94.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88.2, Target = 94.7 75 or Higher White 90.9 89.4 88.2 -1.2 94.7 95.5 5220925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.1, Target = 92.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.1, Target = 92.7 75 or Higher All Students 87.5 92.1 83.1 -9.0 92.7 93.8 58890Declined
High needs -------21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.3, Target = 92.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.3, Target = 92.7 75 or Higher White 87.5 92.0 84.3 -7.7 92.7 93.8 47810Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 16.9 14.62530 4.7 5.12530
High needs 1.8 5.45625 20.0 17.95625
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0340 36.7 26.53425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.4 14.82100 5.0 3.321025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 34.5 36.92520 4.7 7.92520
High needs 14.5 12.5560 20.0 30.4560
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0340 33.3 47.1340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.3 37.320925 3.7 6.72090
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 19.7 21.3890 2.6 3.4890
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.8 22.28125 2.9 2.58125
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 62.0 53.0 -9.0 51.0No17375On Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 58.0 57.0 -1.0 51.0No4575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 60.0 52.5 -7.5 51.0No14875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 82.0 58.0 -24.0 51.0No17275On Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 52, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 68.0 52.0 -16.0 51.0No4575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher White 82.0 57.0 -25.0 51.0Yes14775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04.00-
High needs- 60.04.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.04.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students26325898Yes26325798Yes9090100Yes
High needs616098Yes616098Yes2222100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged28---28---9---
EL and Former EL4---4---2---
Students w/ disabilities3636100Yes3636100Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian18---18---2---
Afr. Amer./Black8---8---1---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White21821398Yes21821297Yes8282100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles