Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Snug Harbor Community School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Snug Harbor Community School

Organization Information

District:

Quincy (02430000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Snug Harbor Community School (02430090)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.4	75.3	78.5	3.2	88.0	89.7	24	144	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		77.9	72.4	75.6	3.2	87.1	89.0	48	125	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.0	74.0	80.2	6.2	76.2	87.0	68	96	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		71.1	73.8	81.0	7.2	83.1	85.6	80	46	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		63.7	57.0	62.3	5.3	78.8	81.9	44	53	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		86.7	84.9	86.0	1.1	92.2	93.4	25	50	50	Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		82.1	70.3	76.3	6.0	89.6	91.1	7	58	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.2	74.1	80.4	6.3	88.5	90.1	28	144	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		79.5	71.0	78.0	7.0	88.0	89.8	59	125	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.5	72.5	84.4	11.9	74.8	86.3	82	96	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		85.8	74.4	87.5	13.1	91.7	92.9	85	46	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		64.8	57.5	62.7	5.2	79.5	82.4	44	53	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		90.7	82.3	89.0	6.7	94.6	95.4	20	50	50	Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		76.5	72.8	77.2	4.4	86.3	88.3	10	58	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.3	59.8	61.5	1.7	86.2	88.2	14	52	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		73.6	55.6	57.2	1.6	84.6	86.8	21	45	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.7	58.7	60.0	1.3	62.1	79.4	36	35	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.1	7.6	144	25	17.7	11.1	144	25
High needs	2.4	2.4	125	0	20.2	12.8	125	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.0	3.1	96	0	18.2	7.3	96	25
EL and Former EL	2.3	4.3	46	25	16.3	6.5	46	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	53	0	38.0	28.3	53	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	10.4	14.0	50	25	8.3	6.0	50	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	1.7	5.2	58	25	20.7	13.8	58	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.7	25.0	144	25	17.0	13.9	144	25
High needs	16.1	20.8	125	25	19.4	16.0	125	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	19.2	22.9	96	25	18.2	9.4	96	25
EL and Former EL	25.6	34.8	46	25	11.6	6.5	46	25
Students w/ disabilities	2.0	7.5	53	25	36.0	32.1	53	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	43.8	38.0	50	0	8.3	8.0	50	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	10.3	20.7	58	25	19.0	15.5	58	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	7.3	7.7	52	0	26.8	21.2	52	25
High needs	3.2	4.4	45	25	32.3	24.4	45	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	3.8	2.9	35	0	30.8	17.1	35	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.5	57.0	12.5	51.0	No	89	75	On Target
High needs		45.0	56.5	11.5	51.0	No	74	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.5	46.5	-1.0	51.0	No	58	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		54.5	60.0	5.5	51.0	No	29	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	27	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		57.0	70.0	13.0	51.0	No	31	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		43.0	60.0	17.0	51.0	No	36	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		29.0	54.0	25.0	51.0	Yes	91	100	Above Target
High needs		28.0	53.5	25.5	51.0	Yes	76	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		35.0	58.0	23.0	51.0	Yes	59	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		26.0	62.0	36.0	51.0	Yes	29	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		50.5	54.5	4.0	51.0	Yes	32	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		21.5	61.0	39.5	51.0	Yes	37	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	73.0	60.0	55.00	25
High needs	73.0	60.0	55.00	25
EL and Former EL	73.0	60.0	55.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	154	154	100	Yes	155	155	100	Yes	57	57	100	Yes
High needs	135	135	100	Yes	136	136	100	Yes	50	50	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	105	105	100	Yes	106	106	100	Yes	39	39	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	51	51	100	Yes	52	52	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	57	57	100	Yes	57	57	100	Yes	20	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	55	55	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes	19	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	13	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	61	61	100	Yes	61	61	100	Yes	25	25	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.