Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Montclair

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Montclair

Organization Information

District:

Quincy (02430000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Montclair (02430065)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.3	85.9	84.5	-1.4	87.9	89.7	45	199	25	No Change
High needs		72.8	81.9	81.2	-0.7	84.1	86.4	75	134	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.8	82.8	84.0	1.2	84.2	91.4	84	83	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		73.8	84.7	79.9	-4.8	84.7	86.9	79	96	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		79.5	86.3	83.4	-2.9	88.0	89.8	18	107	0	Declined
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		81.3	85.0	89.8	4.8	89.1	90.7	60	71	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.6	86.8	89.3	2.5	89.3	90.8	67	199	75	On Target
High needs		77.8	85.1	87.9	2.8	87.1	88.9	93	134	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.3	83.3	87.3	4.0	84.7	91.7	91	83	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		85.3	91.3	91.1	-0.2	91.4	92.7	92	96	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		88.5	91.8	93.2	1.4	93.3	94.3	35	107	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		77.8	80.3	88.4	8.1	87.1	88.9	53	71	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.3	86.2	88.8	2.6	89.1	90.7	79	65	75	On Target
High needs		75.5	82.9	86.2	3.3	85.7	87.8	97	47	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	29	-	-
EL and Former EL		74.2	86.3	85.0	-1.3	85.0	87.1	98	30	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		81.4	85.2	89.0	3.8	89.2	90.7	18	41	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.9	14.1	199	0	8.0	7.5	199	0
High needs	11.1	11.2	134	0	11.9	10.4	134	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.2	13.3	83	0	14.9	9.6	83	25
EL and Former EL	12.9	9.4	96	0	8.6	8.3	96	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	12.7	14.0	107	25	6.9	7.5	107	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	18.5	16.9	71	0	10.8	2.8	71	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	40.3	40.2	199	0	7.3	5.0	199	25
High needs	36.4	38.8	134	0	10.1	6.7	134	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	36.0	45.8	83	25	9.3	7.2	83	25
EL and Former EL	41.1	38.5	96	0	4.2	5.2	96	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	41.3	48.6	107	25	3.8	2.8	107	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	43.9	35.2	71	0	15.2	5.6	71	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	30.4	36.9	65	25	8.9	3.1	65	25
High needs	18.4	40.4	47	25	10.5	4.3	47	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
EL and Former EL	19.4	36.7	30	25	6.5	6.7	30	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	25.0	41.5	41	25	9.4	4.9	41	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.0	41.0	-10.0	51.0	No	130	50	Below Target
High needs		51.0	42.0	-9.0	51.0	No	89	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		49.5	54.0	4.5	51.0	No	56	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		53.0	39.0	-14.0	51.0	No	59	25	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		58.0	42.0	-16.0	51.0	No	72	50	Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		43.0	43.0	0.0	51.0	Yes	43	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	49.0	7.0	51.0	No	132	50	Below Target
High needs		34.0	48.0	14.0	51.0	No	91	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	59.0	21.0	51.0	Yes	57	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		42.0	47.5	5.5	51.0	No	60	50	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		42.0	51.0	9.0	51.0	No	73	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		38.0	51.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	44	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	81.0	60.0	109.00	25
High needs	81.0	60.0	109.00	25
EL and Former EL	81.0	60.0	109.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	209	209	100	Yes	210	210	100	Yes	65	65	100	Yes
High needs	144	144	100	Yes	145	145	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	90	90	100	Yes	90	90	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	105	105	100	Yes	105	105	100	Yes	30	30	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	19	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	117	117	100	Yes	118	118	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	71	71	100	Yes	71	71	100	Yes	18	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.