Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lincoln-Hancock Community School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lincoln-Hancock Community School
Organization Information
District:Quincy (02430000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lincoln-Hancock Community School (02430035)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.2, Target = 85.1CPI = 80.2, Target = 85.1CPI = 80.2, Target = 85.1 74.5 78.5 80.2 1.7 85.1 87.3 2816350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 78.3, Target = 83.4CPI = 78.3, Target = 83.4CPI = 78.3, Target = 83.4 71.6 76.1 78.3 2.2 83.4 85.8 6312350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81, Target = 78.3CPI = 81, Target = 78.3CPI = 81, Target = 78.3 76.3 76.3 81.0 4.7 78.3 88.2 7191100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 78.1, Target = 83.4CPI = 78.1, Target = 83.4CPI = 78.1, Target = 83.4 71.6 79.9 78.1 -1.8 83.4 85.8 744825No Change
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 89.9, Target = 92.1CPI = 89.9, Target = 92.1CPI = 89.9, Target = 92.1 86.4 86.1 89.9 3.8 92.1 93.2 374750Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 82.1, Target = 84CPI = 82.1, Target = 84CPI = 82.1, Target = 84 72.5 77.2 82.1 4.9 84.0 86.3 197450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.4, Target = 82.6CPI = 81.4, Target = 82.6CPI = 81.4, Target = 82.6 70.2 78.7 81.4 2.7 82.6 85.1 3216375On Target
High needsCPI = 79.3, Target = 80.8CPI = 79.3, Target = 80.8CPI = 79.3, Target = 80.8 67.1 78.1 79.3 1.2 80.8 83.6 6512350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.5, Target = 78.7CPI = 80.5, Target = 78.7CPI = 80.5, Target = 78.7 76.8 76.8 80.5 3.7 78.7 88.4 6891100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 77.1, Target = 82.5CPI = 77.1, Target = 82.5CPI = 77.1, Target = 82.5 70.0 83.7 77.1 -6.6 82.5 85.0 60480Declined
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 89.4, Target = 92.7CPI = 89.4, Target = 92.7CPI = 89.4, Target = 92.7 87.5 90.6 89.4 -1.2 92.7 93.8 234725No Change
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 82.4, Target = 82.2CPI = 82.4, Target = 82.2 69.5 76.3 82.4 6.1 82.2 84.8 227475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.4 9.816325 9.0 8.016325
High needs 3.8 7.312325 11.5 9.812325
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.0 6.69125 12.1 7.79125
EL and Former EL 8.7 8.3480 8.7 10.4480
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 11.1 17.04725 4.4 0.04725
Afr. Amer./Black--18---18-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 3.8 9.57425 10.0 6.87425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.6 22.716325 10.4 6.716325
High needs 12.4 17.912325 11.6 8.912325
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.3 13.29125 13.4 6.69125
EL and Former EL 19.6 25.04825 8.7 16.7480
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 24.4 40.44725 0.0 6.4470
Afr. Amer./Black--18---18-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 12.8 18.97425 11.5 4.17425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 30.0 41.5 11.5 51.0No7675On Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 30.0 40.0 10.0 51.0No6075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 23.5 42.0 18.5 51.0No47100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-24--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 24.5 38.0 13.5 51.0No3175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 19.0 43.0 24.0 51.0No75100Above Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 20.0 43.0 23.0 51.0No59100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 17.0 49.0 32.0 51.0No46100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-24--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 14.5 38.5 24.0 51.0Yes30100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 81.0 60.08525
High needs 81.0 60.08525
EL and Former EL 81.0 60.08525
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students171171100Yes173173100Yes----
High needs131131100Yes133133100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged9696100Yes9898100Yes----
EL and Former EL5454100Yes5555100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities17---17-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian5050100Yes5050100Yes----
Afr. Amer./Black18---19-------
Hispanic/Latino18---19-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2-------
White7878100Yes7878100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles