Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Plymouth Commun Intermediate

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Plymouth Commun Intermediate

Organization Information

District:

Plymouth (02390000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Plymouth Commun Intermediate (02390405)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.6	88.1	88.1	0.0	95.1	95.8	39	967	25	No Change
High needs		82.6	77.0	75.7	-1.3	89.9	91.3	30	393	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		83.0	83.0	79.1	-3.9	84.4	91.5	28	263	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		70.7	59.8	62.3	2.5	82.9	85.4	29	214	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		83.3	76.3	75.9	-0.4	90.3	91.7	30	29	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		94.3	83.5	86.2	2.7	96.7	97.2	34	47	50	Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.3	89.1	89.2	0.1	95.5	96.2	32	858	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.5	75.6	77.0	1.4	85.7	87.8	43	962	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		59.9	60.3	60.4	0.1	76.6	80.0	37	390	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.2	67.2	65.1	-2.1	69.9	83.6	38	262	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		44.4	42.1	43.6	1.5	67.6	72.2	26	212	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		58.3	61.5	62.9	1.4	75.7	79.2	41	29	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		76.1	66.5	70.2	3.7	86.1	88.1	31	47	50	Improved Below Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		76.9	77.2	78.5	1.3	86.5	88.5	37	854	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.4	75.3	74.0	-1.3	86.2	88.2	45	331	25	No Change
High needs		62.4	61.8	63.2	1.4	78.1	81.2	60	133	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		66.6	66.6	66.6	0.0	69.4	83.3	65	80	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		50.7	44.4	54.7	10.3	71.2	75.4	62	75	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		79.0	77.1	75.5	-1.6	87.8	89.5	37	292	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.9	12.0	967	25	6.3	8.7	967	0
High needs	3.8	5.1	393	25	14.5	20.4	393	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.1	6.5	263	25	7.9	16.7	263	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.4	214	25	28.9	34.6	214	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Hispanic/Latino	2.6	0.0	29	0	18.4	17.2	29	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4.3	6.4	47	25	10.6	10.6	47	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.8	13.1	858	25	5.3	7.9	858	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.6	14.9	962	25	17.1	16.2	962	0
High needs	4.7	7.9	390	25	36.1	34.6	390	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.8	10.3	262	25	28.4	29.0	262	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	2.4	212	25	60.4	55.7	212	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Hispanic/Latino	8.1	6.9	29	0	27.0	24.1	29	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4.3	14.9	47	25	27.7	25.5	47	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	10.9	15.2	854	25	15.7	14.4	854	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.6	3.9	331	25	11.3	10.3	331	0
High needs	0.0	2.3	133	25	25.9	21.8	133	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	2.5	80	25	18.1	18.8	80	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.3	75	25	51.1	32.0	75	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.7	4.5	292	25	9.5	8.9	292	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		34.0	43.0	9.0	51.0	No	927	50	Below Target
High needs		32.5	41.0	8.5	51.0	No	370	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		34.0	39.5	5.5	51.0	No	246	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		28.0	39.5	11.5	51.0	Yes	198	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		30.0	44.0	14.0	51.0	No	25	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		25.0	53.0	28.0	51.0	Yes	45	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		34.0	43.0	9.0	51.0	No	824	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	49.0	7.0	51.0	No	914	50	Below Target
High needs		40.0	50.0	10.0	51.0	No	361	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	50.0	8.0	51.0	No	241	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		33.0	45.0	12.0	51.0	No	191	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		51.5	52.0	0.5	51.0	Yes	25	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		38.0	46.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	45	75	On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		41.5	49.0	7.5	51.0	No	812	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	7.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	7.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	7.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	1003	993	99	Yes	1003	989	99	Yes	344	339	99	Yes
High needs	420	413	98	Yes	419	410	98	Yes	141	138	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	284	278	98	Yes	283	277	98	Yes	85	83	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	22	-	-	-	22	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	222	219	99	Yes	222	217	98	Yes	78	76	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	36	35	97	Yes	36	35	97	Yes	15	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	49	47	96	Yes	49	47	96	Yes	14	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	881	874	99	Yes	880	870	99	Yes	301	296	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.