Massachusetts School and District Profiles

West Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - West Elementary
Organization Information
District:Plymouth (02390000)School type:Elementary School
School:West Elementary (02390047)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 82.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 82.8, Target = 93.5 88.8 84.1 82.8 -1.3 93.5 94.4 3618825No Change
High needsCPI = 70.1, Target = 88.8CPI = 70.1, Target = 88.8CPI = 70.1, Target = 88.8 80.8 67.7 70.1 2.4 88.8 90.4 257650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.7, Target = 76.4CPI = 78.7, Target = 76.4CPI = 78.7, Target = 76.4 74.3 74.3 78.7 4.4 76.4 87.2 5847100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.2, Target = 86.9CPI = 57.2, Target = 86.9CPI = 57.2, Target = 86.9 77.6 58.9 57.2 -1.7 86.9 88.8 294525No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.9, Target = 93.8CPI = 83.9, Target = 93.8CPI = 83.9, Target = 93.8 89.3 84.4 83.9 -0.5 93.8 94.7 2716925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 84.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 84.7, Target = 92.8 87.6 84.0 84.7 0.7 92.8 93.8 4718850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73, Target = 88.3CPI = 73, Target = 88.3CPI = 73, Target = 88.3 80.0 70.1 73.0 2.9 88.3 90.0 377650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.3, Target = 77.8CPI = 79.3, Target = 77.8CPI = 79.3, Target = 77.8 75.8 75.8 79.3 3.5 77.8 87.9 6447100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.2, Target = 85.8CPI = 62.2, Target = 85.8CPI = 62.2, Target = 85.8 75.6 59.8 62.2 2.4 85.8 87.8 434550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.4, Target = 92.9CPI = 85.4, Target = 92.9CPI = 85.4, Target = 92.9 87.8 84.3 85.4 1.1 92.9 93.9 3616950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.8, Target = 92.1CPI = 86.8, Target = 92.1CPI = 86.8, Target = 92.1 86.5 84.3 86.8 2.5 92.1 93.3 715150Improved Below Target
High needs  76.1---- 88.1-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.9, Target = 92CPI = 88.9, Target = 92CPI = 88.9, Target = 92 86.3 84.1 88.9 4.8 92.0 93.2 704550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.5 15.41880 6.8 8.01880
High needs 6.5 7.97625 17.7 15.87625
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.8 10.6470 14.7 4.34725
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0450 26.2 24.4450
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.0 15.41690 6.7 7.11690
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.7 31.41880 8.6 9.61880
High needs 16.4 15.8760 21.3 21.1760
Econ. Disadvantaged 24.2 19.1470 15.2 17.0470
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 4.9 4.4450 31.7 31.1450
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.0 31.41690 9.3 9.51690
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.9 21.65125 6.5 2.05125
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.1 22.24525 6.9 2.24525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 55.0 47.0 -8.0 51.0No11150Below Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 52.0 46.0 -6.0 51.0No4550Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 54.0 47.0 -7.0 51.0No10150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 52.0 41.0 -11.0 51.0No11150Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 35.0 32.0 -3.0 51.0No4525Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 52.0 41.0 -11.0 51.0No10150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students193193100Yes193193100Yes525198Yes
High needs7979100Yes7979100Yes242396Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5050100Yes5050100Yes16---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4848100Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian3---3---2---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---2---
Hispanic/Latino7---7-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White172172100Yes172172100Yes464598Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles