Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Indian Brook
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Indian Brook
Organization Information
District:Plymouth (02390000)School type:Elementary School
School:Indian Brook (02390012)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.9, Target = 93.4CPI = 86.9, Target = 93.4CPI = 86.9, Target = 93.4 88.6 84.1 86.9 2.8 93.4 94.3 5632650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.7, Target = 85.9CPI = 72.7, Target = 85.9CPI = 72.7, Target = 85.9 75.8 71.5 72.7 1.2 85.9 87.9 3511150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.4, Target = 77.8CPI = 79.4, Target = 77.8CPI = 79.4, Target = 77.8 75.8 75.8 79.4 3.6 77.8 87.9 6274100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 61.4, Target = 79.1CPI = 61.4, Target = 79.1CPI = 61.4, Target = 79.1 64.1 63.2 61.4 -1.8 79.1 82.1 415525No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87, Target = 93.2CPI = 87, Target = 93.2CPI = 87, Target = 93.2 88.3 84.6 87.0 2.4 93.2 94.2 4330950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.8, Target = 91.5CPI = 86.8, Target = 91.5CPI = 86.8, Target = 91.5 85.4 85.4 86.8 1.4 91.5 92.7 5532550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.5, Target = 85CPI = 74.5, Target = 85CPI = 74.5, Target = 85 74.2 72.6 74.5 1.9 85.0 87.1 4411150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.4, Target = 78.9CPI = 83.4, Target = 78.9CPI = 83.4, Target = 78.9 77.0 77.0 83.4 6.4 78.9 88.5 7974100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62.7, Target = 77.7CPI = 62.7, Target = 77.7CPI = 62.7, Target = 77.7 61.7 66.4 62.7 -3.7 77.7 80.9 44550Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.2, Target = 91.6CPI = 87.2, Target = 91.6CPI = 87.2, Target = 91.6 85.6 85.9 87.2 1.3 91.6 92.8 4530850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 72.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 72.7, Target = 90.4 83.6 83.5 72.7 -10.8 90.4 91.8 28980Declined
High needsCPI = 57.8, Target = 84.5CPI = 57.8, Target = 84.5CPI = 57.8, Target = 84.5 73.4 74.3 57.8 -16.5 84.5 86.7 24320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities  67.0---- 83.5-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 73.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 73.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 73.1, Target = 90.6 83.8 84.6 73.1 -11.5 90.6 91.9 14910Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.5 8.93260 6.0 4.632625
High needs 2.8 0.01110 15.1 11.711125
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.7 0.0740 9.4 6.87425
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0550 21.8 20.0550
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.1 9.13090 5.4 4.530925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.1 32.032525 5.2 6.23250
High needs 15.1 14.41110 15.1 13.511125
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.9 18.9740 14.1 5.47425
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 5.5 5.5550 20.0 23.6550
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 26.7 31.830825 5.1 5.83080
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.0 6.1980 6.0 11.2980
High needs 5.4 0.0320 13.5 28.1320
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.3 6.6910 5.3 11.0910
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51 43.0 52.5 9.5 51.0Yes22675On Target
High needsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 41.0 46.5 5.5 51.0No6850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 41.0 54.0 13.0 51.0No4475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 39.0 36.0 -3.0 51.0No3725Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 43.0 52.0 9.0 51.0No21475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 48.0 52.0 4.0 51.0Yes22375On Target
High needsSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 44.5 47.5 3.0 51.0No6850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 42.5 55.0 12.5 51.0Yes4475On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 38.0 41.0 3.0 51.0No3750Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 48.0 52.0 4.0 51.0Yes21175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students33733599Yes33833599Yes100100100Yes
High needs11811799Yes11911899Yes3333100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged7878100Yes7979100Yes21---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities595898Yes605998Yes2121100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino7---7---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---9---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White319318100Yes31931799Yes9393100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles