Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Stearns

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Stearns

Organization Information
District:Pittsfield (02360000)School type:Elementary School
School:Stearns (02360090)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90, Target = 98 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 90, Target = 98 75 or Higher All Students 96.6 87.5 90.0 2.5 98.0 98.3 7010550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 88, Target = 96.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 88, Target = 96.3 75 or Higher High needs 93.6 83.2 88.0 4.8 96.3 96.8 955075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.2, Target = 86 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 87.2, Target = 86CPI = 87.2, Target = 8675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 84.7 84.7 87.2 2.5 86.0 92.4 924175On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 89.8, Target = 98.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 89.8, Target = 98.3 75 or Higher White 97.1 88.9 89.8 0.9 98.3 98.6 608350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.1, Target = 96.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 93.1, Target = 96.1 75 or Higher All Students 93.3 87.9 93.1 5.2 96.1 96.7 8510575On Target
High needsCPI = 89.5, Target = 92.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 89.5, Target = 92.6 75 or Higher High needs 87.3 84.6 89.5 4.9 92.6 93.7 955075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 91.5, Target = 86.4 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 91.5, Target = 86.4CPI = 91.5, Target = 86.475 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 85.2 85.2 91.5 6.3 86.4 92.6 9741100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 93.7, Target = 97 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 93.7, Target = 97 75 or Higher White 94.8 89.2 93.7 4.5 97.0 97.4 838375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.4, Target = 93.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.4, Target = 93.9 75 or Higher All Students 89.5 84.0 84.4 0.4 93.9 94.8 624050Improved Below Target
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 85.5, Target = 94.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 85.5, Target = 94.9 75 or Higher White 91.2 84.7 85.5 0.8 94.9 95.6 523150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 3.6 10.510525 4.5 3.810525
High needs 1.9 2.0500 7.7 4.05025
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.3 2.4410 4.5 4.9410
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 4.2 10.88325 3.2 3.6830
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.0 26.710525 5.4 1.010525
High needs 11.5 18.05025 7.7 2.05025
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.4 22.04125 6.8 2.44125
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 18.9 27.78325 4.2 1.28325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.3 12.54025 2.8 0.04025
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 9.7 12.93125 3.2 0.03125
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 40.0 55.0 15.0 51.0Yes65100Above Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 42.0 54.0 12.0 51.0Yes2775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 5175 or Higher White 42.0 55.0 13.0 51.0No5575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 44.5 63.0 18.5 51.0Yes65100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 41.0 63.0 22.0 51.0Yes27100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher White 49.0 64.0 15.0 51.0Yes55100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students11110796Yes11110796Yes424198Yes
High needs535196Yes535196Yes17---
Econ. Disadvantaged444295Yes444295Yes13---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities23---23---7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino8---8---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White888495Yes888495Yes323197Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles