Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Allendale
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Allendale
Organization Information
District:Pittsfield (02360000)School type:Elementary School
School:Allendale (02360010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.5, Target = 91.3CPI = 84.5, Target = 91.3CPI = 84.5, Target = 91.3 85.0 78.1 84.5 6.4 91.3 92.5 4514850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.2, Target = 88.6CPI = 82.2, Target = 88.6CPI = 82.2, Target = 88.6 80.4 76.5 82.2 5.7 88.6 90.2 798350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.3, Target = 78CPI = 81.3, Target = 78CPI = 81.3, Target = 78 76.0 76.0 81.3 5.3 78.0 88.0 7275100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.2, Target = 91.9CPI = 84.2, Target = 91.9CPI = 84.2, Target = 91.9 86.1 78.2 84.2 6.0 91.9 93.1 2810650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.1, Target = 90.4CPI = 81.1, Target = 90.4CPI = 81.1, Target = 90.4 83.6 77.0 81.1 4.1 90.4 91.8 3114750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.8, Target = 88.8CPI = 79.8, Target = 88.8CPI = 79.8, Target = 88.8 80.8 74.7 79.8 5.1 88.8 90.4 678350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.3, Target = 78CPI = 78.3, Target = 78 76.0 76.0 78.3 2.3 78.0 88.0 587575On Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.2, Target = 91.1CPI = 81.2, Target = 91.1CPI = 81.2, Target = 91.1 84.8 77.5 81.2 3.7 91.1 92.4 1810550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 64.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 64.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 64.2, Target = 85.4 75.0 70.8 64.2 -6.6 85.4 87.5 17530Declined
High needsCPI = 56.5, Target = 72CPI = 56.5, Target = 72CPI = 56.5, Target = 72 58.0 68.0 56.5 -11.5 72.0 79.0 20270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  71.3---- 85.7-26--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------2--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 67.4, Target = 86.2CPI = 67.4, Target = 86.2CPI = 67.4, Target = 86.2 76.4 71.2 67.4 -3.8 86.2 88.2 7360Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.6 5.414825 7.8 3.414825
High needs 2.4 4.88325 7.1 3.68325
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.7 5.37525 8.0 4.07525
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.0 5.710625 8.4 2.810625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.7 19.014725 11.8 8.814725
High needs 10.7 15.78325 13.1 9.68325
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.3 13.37525 12.0 10.77525
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.1 19.010525 11.8 8.610525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.1 0.0530 10.4 15.1530
High needs 4.0 0.0270 12.0 18.5270
Econ. Disadvantaged--26---26-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--2---2-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.6 0.0360 12.8 11.13625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 36.0 43.0 7.0 51.0Yes9975On Target
High needsSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 24.5 37.5 13.0 51.0Yes5475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51SGP = 37.5, Target = 51 23.0 37.5 14.5 51.0No52100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 36.0 48.0 12.0 51.0Yes7475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 28.5, Target = 51SGP = 28.5, Target = 51SGP = 28.5, Target = 51 28.5 28.5 0.0 51.0Yes9875On Target
High needsSGP = 23, Target = 51SGP = 23, Target = 51SGP = 23, Target = 51 28.0 23.0 -5.0 51.0Yes5475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 23, Target = 51SGP = 23, Target = 51SGP = 23, Target = 51 25.0 23.0 -2.0 51.0No520Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51 27.0 27.0 0.0 51.0No730Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students160160100Yes16015999Yes5959100Yes
High needs9494100Yes9494100Yes3232100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged8686100Yes8686100Yes3131100Yes
EL and Former EL13---13---4---
Students w/ disabilities19---19---3---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian3---3---2---
Afr. Amer./Black13---13---6---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White113113100Yes11311299Yes3838100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles