Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Pembroke Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - North Pembroke Elementary
Organization Information
District:Pembroke (02310000)School type:Elementary School
School:North Pembroke Elementary (02310015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.2 91.8 92.4 92.4 0.0 95.2 95.9 8132575On Target
High needsCPI = 79.6, Target = 88.4CPI = 79.6, Target = 88.4CPI = 79.6, Target = 88.4 80.1 79.7 79.6 -0.1 88.4 90.1 697125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.8, Target = 85.4CPI = 83.8, Target = 85.4CPI = 83.8, Target = 85.4 84.1 84.1 83.8 -0.3 85.4 92.1 833425No Change
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.4, Target = 86.1CPI = 73.4, Target = 86.1CPI = 73.4, Target = 86.1 76.2 72.1 73.4 1.3 86.1 88.1 734750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.7, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.7, Target = 95.2 91.7 92.8 92.7 -0.1 95.2 95.9 7731075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.4, Target = 95.1CPI = 93.4, Target = 95.1CPI = 93.4, Target = 95.1 91.6 91.3 93.4 2.1 95.1 95.8 8632475On Target
High needsCPI = 88, Target = 87.5CPI = 88, Target = 87.5 78.6 79.7 88.0 8.3 87.5 89.3 937175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.2, Target = 79.8CPI = 88.2, Target = 79.8CPI = 88.2, Target = 79.8 78.0 78.0 88.2 10.2 79.8 89.0 9234100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85.1, Target = 83.8CPI = 85.1, Target = 83.8CPI = 85.1, Target = 83.8 72.2 76.0 85.1 9.1 83.8 86.1 9647100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.4, Target = 95CPI = 93.4, Target = 95CPI = 93.4, Target = 95 91.4 91.6 93.4 1.8 95.0 95.7 8130975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 84.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 84.6, Target = 95.2 91.7 86.7 84.6 -2.1 95.2 95.9 638125No Change
High needs -------12--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.9, Target = 95.4CPI = 85.9, Target = 95.4CPI = 85.9, Target = 95.4 92.1 86.5 85.9 -0.6 95.4 96.1 547825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.7 24.032525 1.8 2.83250
High needs 3.8 7.07125 7.5 11.3710
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.9 11.83425 7.3 8.8340
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 1.9 2.14725 11.5 14.9470
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.7 24.531025 1.2 2.63100
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.3 39.832425 2.0 1.232425
High needs 12.5 16.97125 6.3 2.87125
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.6 23.53425 9.8 2.93425
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 7.7 6.4470 7.7 4.34725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.0 39.230925 2.1 1.330925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.1 13.6810 2.1 2.5810
High needs--12---12-
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.9 14.1780 2.2 0.07825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 71.0 53.0 -18.0 51.0Yes24575On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 60.0 55.0 -5.0 51.0No5375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 71.5 56.5 -15.0 51.0Yes3875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 72.0 53.5 -18.5 51.0No23675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 64.0 46.0 -18.0 51.0Yes25175On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 68.0 46.0 -22.0 51.0Yes5375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 87.0 54.5 -32.5 51.0Yes3875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 64.0 45.0 -19.0 51.0Yes24275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06-
High needs- 60.06-
EL and Former EL- 60.06-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students33933097Yes33932997Yes858296Yes
High needs787296Yes787296Yes13---
Econ. Disadvantaged383596Yes383596Yes7---
EL and Former EL4---4-------
Students w/ disabilities514896Yes514896Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6---2---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White32031398Yes32031298Yes817998Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles