Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Charles J Prescott
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Charles J Prescott
Organization Information
District:Norwood (02200000)School type:Elementary School
School:Charles J Prescott (02200025)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.2, Target = 94.2 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 97.2, Target = 94.2CPI = 97.2, Target = 94.275 or Higher All Students 90.1 92.8 97.2 4.4 94.2 95.1 99143100Above Target
High needsCPI = 95.7, Target = 87.3 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 95.7, Target = 87.3CPI = 95.7, Target = 87.375 or Higher High needs 78.2 86.0 95.7 9.7 87.3 89.1 9941100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 96.8, Target = 95 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96.8, Target = 95CPI = 96.8, Target = 9575 or Higher White 91.5 93.9 96.8 2.9 95.0 95.8 98108100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.6, Target = 91.5 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 95.6, Target = 91.5CPI = 95.6, Target = 91.575 or Higher All Students 85.5 88.3 95.6 7.3 91.5 92.8 96141100Above Target
High needsCPI = 91.9, Target = 84.8 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 91.9, Target = 84.8CPI = 91.9, Target = 84.875 or Higher High needs 73.9 78.7 91.9 13.2 84.8 87.0 9840100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 96.1, Target = 93.2 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96.1, Target = 93.2CPI = 96.1, Target = 93.275 or Higher White 88.4 90.2 96.1 5.9 93.2 94.2 95108100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 89.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86.7, Target = 89.6 75 or Higher All Students 82.1 85.7 86.7 1.0 89.6 91.1 704750Improved Below Target
High needs -------13--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 86.8, Target = 90.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.8, Target = 90.9 75 or Higher White 84.4 85.9 86.8 0.9 90.9 92.2 593450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.1 28.014325 1.4 0.014325
High needs 4.9 7.34125 4.9 0.04125
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--17---17-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 15.0 28.710825 0.0 0.010825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.5 52.514125 2.8 1.414125
High needs 22.0 30.04025 7.3 2.54025
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 27.1 51.910825 2.8 0.910825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.5 23.44725 0.0 0.04725
High needs--13---13-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--3---3-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 9.4 26.53425 0.0 0.03425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 45.0 57.0 12.0 51.0Yes9775On Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 47.0 59.0 12.0 51.0Yes2575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher White 42.5 56.0 13.5 51.0Yes7575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 54.0 61.5 7.5 51.0Yes96100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-25--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 5175 or Higher White 53.0 58.0 5.0 51.0Yes7575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.011.00-
High needs- 60.011.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.011.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students15014899Yes14914899Yes5050100Yes
High needs484696Yes484798Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged23---23---9---
EL and Former EL16---16---7---
Students w/ disabilities16---16---3---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian19---18---6---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---4---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White11111099Yes11111099Yes3434100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles