Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Norwell High
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Norwell High
Organization Information
District:Norwell (02190000)School type:High School
School:Norwell High (02190505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.8, Target = 99.4 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 99.8, Target = 99.475 or Higher All Students 99.0 100.0 99.8 -0.2 99.4 99.5 94163100Above Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.8, Target = 99.4 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 99.8, Target = 99.475 or Higher White 99.0 100.0 99.8 -0.2 99.4 99.5 87154100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.7, Target = 98.1 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 97.7, Target = 98.175 or Higher All Students 96.8 99.9 97.7 -2.2 98.1 98.4 88161100Above Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98, Target = 98.1 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 98, Target = 98.175 or Higher White 96.8 99.9 98.0 -1.9 98.1 98.4 84152100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.5, Target = 97.4 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 97.5, Target = 97.475 or Higher All Students 95.6 98.4 97.5 -0.9 97.4 97.8 87157100Above Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.7, Target = 97.3 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 97.7, Target = 97.375 or Higher White 95.3 98.3 97.7 -0.6 97.3 97.7 82150100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 86.7 81.61630 0.0 0.016325
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 86.1 81.81540 0.0 0.015425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 83.9 73.31610 0.0 1.21610
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 83.2 74.31520 0.0 1.31520
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 48.3 45.91570 0.0 0.015725
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.5 46.01500 0.0 0.015025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 70, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 56.5 70.0 13.5 51.0No160100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-19--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 71.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 56.0 71.5 15.5 51.0No152100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 56.0 47.0 -9.0 51.0No15950Below Target
High needs --- 51.0-18--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 56.0 46.0 -10.0 51.0No15150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 80 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.8, Target = 8075 or Higher All Students 97.5 98.8 1.3 80.0 90.0169100Above Target
High needs --- 80.0 90.042--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.029--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 99.4, Target = 80 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 99.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 99.4, Target = 8075 or Higher White 97.4 99.4 2.0 80.0 90.0160100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 85 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 8575 or Higher All Students 99.5 98.7 -0.8 85.0 95.0158100Above Target
High needs --- 85.0 95.043--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.031--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 85 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 98.7, Target = 8575 or Higher White 100.0 98.7 -1.3 85.0 95.0153100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0Dropout Rate 75 or Higher All Students 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.095675100Above Target
High needs -------92--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------77--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0Dropout Rate 75 or Higher White 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.092644100Above Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16416399Yes16416198Yes164164100Yes
High needs20---20---20---
Econ. Disadvantaged8---8---8---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities12---12---12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino6---6---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White15515499Yes15515298Yes155155100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles