Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Norwell Middle School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Norwell Middle School
Organization Information
District:Norwell (02190000)School type:Middle School
School:Norwell Middle School (02190405)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97, Target = 99.4CPI = 97, Target = 99.4CPI = 97, Target = 99.4 98.9 95.5 97.0 1.5 99.4 99.5 93530100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.8, Target = 97CPI = 86.8, Target = 97CPI = 86.8, Target = 97 94.9 84.1 86.8 2.7 97.0 97.5 859550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85, Target = 96.7CPI = 85, Target = 96.7CPI = 85, Target = 96.7 94.3 81.1 85.0 3.9 96.7 97.2 898050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 97.1, Target = 99.4CPI = 97.1, Target = 99.4CPI = 97.1, Target = 99.4 98.9 95.5 97.1 1.6 99.4 99.5 91497100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.9, Target = 95CPI = 89.9, Target = 95CPI = 89.9, Target = 95 91.4 83.1 89.9 6.8 95.0 95.7 8752775On Target
High needsCPI = 67.6, Target = 83.7CPI = 67.6, Target = 83.7CPI = 67.6, Target = 83.7 72.0 62.4 67.6 5.2 83.7 86.0 689450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63.9, Target = 82.6CPI = 63.9, Target = 82.6CPI = 63.9, Target = 82.6 70.1 58.1 63.9 5.8 82.6 85.1 867950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 89.9, Target = 95CPI = 89.9, Target = 95CPI = 89.9, Target = 95 91.4 83.3 89.9 6.6 95.0 95.7 8449475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.8, Target = 93.2CPI = 88.8, Target = 93.2CPI = 88.8, Target = 93.2 88.3 91.5 88.8 -2.7 93.2 94.2 95194100Above Target
High needsCPI = 69, Target = 85.4CPI = 69, Target = 85.4CPI = 69, Target = 85.4 75.0 79.9 69.0 -10.9 85.4 87.5 84290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.6, Target = 83.9CPI = 65.6, Target = 83.9CPI = 65.6, Target = 83.9 72.4 76.5 65.6 -10.9 83.9 86.2 912475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 88.9, Target = 92.9CPI = 88.9, Target = 92.9CPI = 88.9, Target = 92.9 87.9 91.3 88.9 -2.4 92.9 94.0 93184100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.3 30.453025 1.9 0.953025
High needs 8.4 3.2950 8.4 5.39525
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 2.3 2.5800 10.5 6.38025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 22.9 29.449725 1.9 0.849725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.3 30.652725 6.8 3.252725
High needs 5.6 5.3940 27.1 14.99425
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.5 1.3790 30.2 17.77925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 15.0 28.949425 6.4 3.249425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.6 16.019425 1.5 3.11940
High needs 4.9 6.92925 7.3 17.2290
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 4.22425 8.8 20.8240
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 9.1 15.218425 1.6 2.71840
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 44.0 53.0 9.0 51.0Yes52275On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 42.0 51.0 9.0 51.0Yes8975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 45.0 50.0 5.0 51.0Yes7475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-2--
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 43.0 52.0 9.0 51.0Yes48975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 35.0 63.5 28.5 51.0Yes520100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 31.0 53.0 22.0 51.0No89100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51 37.0 58.5 21.5 51.0No74100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-2--
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 34.0 63.0 29.0 51.0Yes487100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students53853399Yes53853099Yes19519499Yes
High needs999697Yes999596Yes302997Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---6---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities838198Yes838096Yes252496Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian13---13---5---
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---2---
Hispanic/Latino6---6-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2---1---
White50349999Yes50349699Yes18518499Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles