Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Brookfield Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - North Brookfield Elementary
Organization Information
District:North Brookfield (02150000)School type:Elementary School
School:North Brookfield Elementary (02150015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 82.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 82.7, Target = 90.4 83.6 82.9 82.7 -0.2 90.4 91.8 3617825No Change
High needsCPI = 74.4, Target = 83.8CPI = 74.4, Target = 83.8CPI = 74.4, Target = 83.8 72.2 72.9 74.4 1.5 83.8 86.1 427850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.2, Target = 77.1CPI = 76.2, Target = 77.1 75.0 75.0 76.2 1.2 77.1 87.5 476575On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.3, Target = 73CPI = 59.3, Target = 73CPI = 59.3, Target = 73 53.7 53.3 59.3 6.0 73.0 76.9 342750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.4, Target = 90.4CPI = 82.4, Target = 90.4CPI = 82.4, Target = 90.4 83.5 82.3 82.4 0.1 90.4 91.8 2115950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74, Target = 86.2CPI = 74, Target = 86.2CPI = 74, Target = 86.2 76.4 73.3 74.0 0.7 86.2 88.2 1317850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.8, Target = 80.3CPI = 67.8, Target = 80.3CPI = 67.8, Target = 80.3 66.3 60.7 67.8 7.1 80.3 83.2 207650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.2, Target = 64.3CPI = 69.2, Target = 64.3CPI = 69.2, Target = 64.3 61.1 61.1 69.2 8.1 64.3 80.6 2265100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 56, Target = 67.2CPI = 56, Target = 67.2CPI = 56, Target = 67.2 43.8 42.5 56.0 13.5 67.2 71.9 252550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 73, Target = 86.2CPI = 73, Target = 86.2CPI = 73, Target = 86.2 76.3 74.0 73.0 -1.0 86.2 88.2 615925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 58.1, Target = 81.2CPI = 58.1, Target = 81.2CPI = 58.1, Target = 81.2 67.7 75.0 58.1 -16.9 81.2 83.9 12400Declined
High needs  67.4---- 83.7-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 58.1, Target = 81.9CPI = 58.1, Target = 81.9CPI = 58.1, Target = 81.9 68.9 77.8 58.1 -19.7 81.9 84.5 2340Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.3 6.21780 9.6 9.61780
High needs 4.8 1.3780 19.0 15.47825
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.7 1.5650 18.6 15.46525
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0270 36.7 33.3270
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.1 5.01590 9.7 10.11590
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.9 13.517825 16.4 14.617825
High needs 7.1 6.6760 29.8 23.77625
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.6 6.2650 31.4 21.56525
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.02525 50.0 40.02525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.6 12.61590 16.2 15.71590
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.8 0.0400 7.8 17.5400
High needs--22---22-
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.1 0.0340 4.4 17.6340
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 44.0 36.0 -8.0 51.0No13225Below Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 42.0 33.0 -9.0 51.0No5425Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 34.0 30.0 -4.0 51.0No450Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 44.0 35.0 -9.0 51.0No11725Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 41.0 53.5 12.5 51.0No13475On Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 39.5 45.5 6.0 51.0Yes5475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 39.5 47.0 7.5 51.0Yes4675On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 46.0 50.5 4.5 51.0No11875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18318199Yes18418198Yes4242100Yes
High needs8080100Yes817896Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6666100Yes676699Yes20---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities2828100Yes282694No7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino10---10---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16416299Yes16516298Yes3535100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles