Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Northbridge Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - W Edward Balmer
Organization Information
District:Northbridge (02140000)School type:Elementary School
School:W Edward Balmer (02140001)Grades served:02,03,04
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.4, Target = 89.4CPI = 76.4, Target = 89.4CPI = 76.4, Target = 89.4 81.8 73.8 76.4 2.6 89.4 90.9 1935450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 60.1, Target = 79CPI = 60.1, Target = 79CPI = 60.1, Target = 79 64.0 55.6 60.1 4.5 79.0 82.0 414150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 65.3, Target = 65.6CPI = 65.3, Target = 65.6 62.5 62.5 65.3 2.8 65.6 81.3 119575On Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 45.4, Target = 70.4CPI = 45.4, Target = 70.4CPI = 45.4, Target = 70.4 49.2 41.0 45.4 4.4 70.4 74.6 87150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino  77.4---- 88.7-26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 77.3, Target = 89.6CPI = 77.3, Target = 89.6CPI = 77.3, Target = 89.6 82.1 75.1 77.3 2.2 89.6 91.1 931050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.7, Target = 87.4CPI = 78.7, Target = 87.4CPI = 78.7, Target = 87.4 78.4 73.5 78.7 5.2 87.4 89.2 2335250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 63.8, Target = 78.8CPI = 63.8, Target = 78.8CPI = 63.8, Target = 78.8 63.7 58.7 63.8 5.1 78.8 81.9 1014150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.4, Target = 66.1CPI = 68.4, Target = 66.1CPI = 68.4, Target = 66.1 63.0 63.0 68.4 5.4 66.1 81.5 2095100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 51.8, Target = 74CPI = 51.8, Target = 74CPI = 51.8, Target = 74 55.4 48.1 51.8 3.7 74.0 77.7 177150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino  71.4---- 85.7-26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 79.5, Target = 87.6CPI = 79.5, Target = 87.6CPI = 79.5, Target = 87.6 78.8 74.9 79.5 4.6 87.6 89.4 1430850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.6 5.635425 15.6 14.43540
High needs 1.4 0.71410 32.7 30.51410
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 0.0950 23.5 24.2950
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.47125 51.9 50.7710
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--26---26-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 3.8 6.131025 14.2 14.23100
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.3 20.535225 18.5 12.835225
High needs 4.1 8.514125 34.0 24.114125
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.1 10.59525 27.6 18.99525
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 1.2 4.27125 48.1 38.07125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--26---26-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 14.2 21.130825 16.9 12.730825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 31.0 40.0 9.0 51.0No18350Below Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 22.5 36.0 13.5 51.0No7275On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 23.5 41.0 17.5 51.0No47100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 19.0 31.0 12.0 51.0No3875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 32.0 40.0 8.0 51.0No16550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 47.0 61.0 14.0 51.0Yes183100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 31.0 61.0 30.0 51.0No72100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51 24.5 73.0 48.5 51.0Yes47100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 23.0 51.5 28.5 51.0No38100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 49.5 61.0 11.5 51.0Yes165100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students364364100Yes362362100Yes----
High needs150150100Yes150150100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged103103100Yes103103100Yes----
EL and Former EL12---12-------
Students w/ disabilities7474100Yes7474100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3-------
Hispanic/Latino2626100Yes2626100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White319319100Yes317317100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles