Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Robert E. Melican Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Robert E. Melican Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Northborough (02130000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Robert E. Melican Middle School (02130305)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.6	92.3	92.8	0.5	96.9	97.3	63	647	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		81.4	75.9	78.0	2.1	89.2	90.7	38	164	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.9	86.9	78.4	-8.5	88.0	93.5	25	58	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		74.0	76.7	78.9	2.2	82.7	87.0	69	32	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		77.9	66.1	72.5	6.4	87.1	89.0	57	111	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		95.1	95.3	96.2	0.9	97.1	97.6	50	66	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White		94.9	93.0	93.6	0.6	97.0	97.5	60	521	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		82.7	84.2	83.8	-0.4	89.9	91.4	67	644	25	No Change
High needs		57.2	57.4	57.0	-0.4	75.0	78.6	19	161	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.3	68.3	61.8	-6.5	70.9	84.2	25	57	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		51.9	60.0	53.9	-6.1	67.9	76.0	42	32	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		50.9	45.8	49.1	3.3	71.4	75.5	47	109	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		94.3	93.8	95.1	1.3	96.7	97.2	58	66	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
White		83.0	84.2	84.4	0.2	90.1	91.5	61	520	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.7	88.1	84.3	-3.8	94.6	95.4	84	199	75	On Target
High needs		72.4	71.1	63.8	-7.3	83.9	86.2	65	56	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		64.0	52.5	59.0	6.5	79.0	82.0	74	36	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		91.0	87.6	85.9	-1.7	94.8	95.5	85	163	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	24.3	21.8	647	0	4.3	2.8	647	25
High needs	7.1	5.5	164	0	16.5	10.4	164	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	11.1	12.1	58	0	7.9	13.8	58	0
EL and Former EL	13.3	3.1	32	0	16.7	12.5	32	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.9	0.9	111	0	23.9	13.5	111	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	45.3	47.0	66	0	3.1	1.5	66	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
White	22.0	18.6	521	0	3.4	1.7	521	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	37.5	39.8	644	0	11.2	10.9	644	0
High needs	8.9	11.2	161	25	39.6	37.3	161	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	12.7	17.5	57	25	23.8	33.3	57	0
EL and Former EL	13.3	12.5	32	0	36.7	43.8	32	0
Students w/ disabilities	2.8	5.5	109	25	53.7	46.8	109	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Asian	75.0	81.8	66	0	4.7	4.5	66	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
White	33.7	35.2	520	0	10.0	9.2	520	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.1	14.6	199	25	5.2	7.0	199	0
High needs	2.0	3.6	56	25	21.6	21.4	56	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	36	0	36.7	25.0	36	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
White	6.8	13.5	163	25	5.1	5.5	163	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	51.0	2.0	51.0	No	635	75	On Target
High needs		39.0	51.5	12.5	51.0	No	160	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		37.5	50.0	12.5	51.0	No	55	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		52.0	58.5	6.5	51.0	No	30	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		38.0	51.0	13.0	51.0	No	109	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Asian		53.0	69.0	16.0	51.0	No	65	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	22	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
White		48.5	50.0	1.5	51.0	No	511	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		57.0	59.0	2.0	51.0	No	632	75	On Target
High needs		48.0	50.0	2.0	51.0	No	157	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.5	53.0	9.5	51.0	No	55	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		49.0	59.0	10.0	51.0	No	30	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	47.0	3.0	51.0	No	107	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Asian		62.0	75.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	65	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
White		55.0	56.0	1.0	51.0	No	510	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	18.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	18.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	18.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	656	653	100	Yes	655	650	99	Yes	203	199	98	Yes
High needs	172	169	98	Yes	170	165	97	Yes	59	56	95	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	63	61	97	Yes	62	60	97	Yes	22	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	34	34	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	115	113	98	Yes	115	111	97	Yes	38	36	95	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	67	67	100	Yes	66	66	100	Yes	19	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	24	-	-	-	24	-	-	-	8	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	22	-	-	-	21	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
White	527	524	99	Yes	527	523	99	Yes	166	163	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.