Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Joseph W Martin Jr Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Joseph W Martin Jr Elementary
Organization Information
District:North Attleborough (02120000)School type:Elementary School
School:Joseph W Martin Jr Elementary (02120013)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.5, Target = 95.7CPI = 87.5, Target = 95.7CPI = 87.5, Target = 95.7 92.7 88.5 87.5 -1.0 95.7 96.4 5939925No Change
High needsCPI = 73.8, Target = 87.2CPI = 73.8, Target = 87.2CPI = 73.8, Target = 87.2 78.0 75.0 73.8 -1.2 87.2 89.0 4013025No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.5, Target = 85.4CPI = 77.5, Target = 85.4CPI = 77.5, Target = 85.4 84.1 84.1 77.5 -6.6 85.4 92.1 53610Declined
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.8, Target = 86.3CPI = 65.8, Target = 86.3CPI = 65.8, Target = 86.3 76.5 70.1 65.8 -4.3 86.3 88.3 54760Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------24--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 88, Target = 95.8CPI = 88, Target = 95.8CPI = 88, Target = 95.8 92.8 88.3 88.0 -0.3 95.8 96.4 4933925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.5, Target = 93.9CPI = 88.5, Target = 93.9CPI = 88.5, Target = 93.9 89.5 87.5 88.5 1.0 93.9 94.8 6439950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.3, Target = 85.7CPI = 77.3, Target = 85.7CPI = 77.3, Target = 85.7 75.5 71.1 77.3 6.2 85.7 87.8 5613050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.3, Target = 79.2CPI = 78.3, Target = 79.2 77.3 77.3 78.3 1.0 79.2 88.7 586175On Target
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.4, Target = 84.9CPI = 70.4, Target = 84.9CPI = 70.4, Target = 84.9 74.1 65.1 70.4 5.3 84.9 87.1 667650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------24--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 89.3, Target = 93.6CPI = 89.3, Target = 93.6CPI = 89.3, Target = 93.6 89.1 87.5 89.3 1.8 93.6 94.6 5833950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85, Target = 93.4CPI = 85, Target = 93.4CPI = 85, Target = 93.4 88.6 84.2 85.0 0.8 93.4 94.3 6412550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.1, Target = 85.9CPI = 76.1, Target = 85.9CPI = 76.1, Target = 85.9 75.9 60.2 76.1 15.9 85.9 88.0 774650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities  75.0---- 87.5-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.6, Target = 93.1CPI = 85.6, Target = 93.1CPI = 85.6, Target = 93.1 88.2 83.9 85.6 1.7 93.1 94.1 5210950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.2 10.83990 3.9 4.33990
High needs 5.3 2.31300 13.7 12.313025
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.1 4.9610 6.1 13.1610
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 1.4 0.0760 18.3 18.4760
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--24---24-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 12.5 11.53390 4.3 3.833925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.8 29.33990 6.3 5.539925
High needs 16.8 12.31300 22.1 14.613025
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.3 13.1610 12.1 13.1610
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 8.5 5.3760 26.8 21.17625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--24---24-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 26.3 28.03390 5.9 4.733925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.3 16.012525 5.7 2.412525
High needs 0.0 4.34625 21.9 6.54625
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.4 17.410925 6.3 2.810925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 44.0 49.0 5.0 51.0No25150Below Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 47.0 41.0 -6.0 51.0No7950Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-40--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 49.5 37.0 -12.5 51.0No4525Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 45.0 51.0 6.0 51.0No21975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 52.5 55.5 3.0 51.0No25475On Target
High needsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 41.5 50.5 9.0 51.0No8275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-42--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 40.5 41.5 1.0 51.0No4850Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 54.0 57.0 3.0 51.0No22175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students40239999Yes403403100Yes12812698Yes
High needs13112898Yes132132100Yes474698Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged626198Yes6363100Yes25---
EL and Former EL21---21---9---
Students w/ disabilities7676100Yes7676100Yes2121100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian24---24---7---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---2---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2-------
White341340100Yes342342100Yes11110998Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles