Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Amvet Boulevard

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Amvet Boulevard

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.1, Target = 92.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.1, Target = 92.9 75 or Higher All Students 87.8 90.4 91.1 0.7 92.9 93.9 7522350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.2, Target = 87.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 80.2, Target = 87.1 75 or Higher High needs 77.8 81.9 80.2 -1.7 87.1 88.9 714825No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.1, Target = 80.8 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 72.1, Target = 80.8 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 67.0 76.0 72.1 -3.9 80.8 83.5 70260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.2, Target = 93.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.2, Target = 93.2 75 or Higher White 88.4 91.7 91.2 -0.5 93.2 94.2 6819725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 92 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 91, Target = 9275 or Higher All Students 86.3 90.9 91.0 0.1 92.0 93.2 7622375On Target
High needsCPI = 81.3, Target = 85.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 81.3, Target = 85.1 75 or Higher High needs 74.5 82.3 81.3 -1.0 85.1 87.3 734825No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.1, Target = 78.7 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 72.1, Target = 78.7 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 63.4 79.8 72.1 -7.7 78.7 81.7 70260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.6, Target = 92.5 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.5 75 or Higher White 87.1 91.4 90.6 -0.8 92.5 93.6 6619725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.3, Target = 92.1 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 91.3, Target = 92.175 or Higher All Students 86.5 95.3 91.3 -4.0 92.1 93.3 887875On Target
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.4, Target = 92.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.4, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher White 87.7 98.0 91.4 -6.6 92.8 93.9 826775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 19.3 17.92230 2.5 1.822325
High needs 6.5 4.2480 6.5 4.24825
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0260 11.5 7.72625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.8 19.31970 1.9 2.01970
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.5 41.322325 3.0 1.822325
High needs 24.2 12.5480 4.8 4.24825
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 7.7 0.0260 3.8 3.8260
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.9 39.619725 3.7 2.019725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 45.3 30.8780 1.6 1.37825
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 49.0 29.9670 0.0 1.5670
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 58.0 53.0 -5.0 51.0No14775On Target
High needsSGP = 39.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 47.0 39.5 -7.5 51.0No3425Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 57.0 54.5 -2.5 51.0No12875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 57.0 66.0 9.0 51.0No148100Above Target
High needsSGP = 68, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 61.0 68.0 7.0 51.0No35100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 5175 or Higher White 55.5 66.0 10.5 51.0No128100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.08.00-
High needs- 60.08.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.08.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students231230100Yes231231100Yes8080100Yes
High needs515098Yes5151100Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged21---21---7---
EL and Former EL9---9---5---
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---4---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---2---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White200199100Yes200200100Yes6868100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles