Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bridge Street
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bridge Street
Organization Information
District:Northampton (02100000)School type:Elementary School
School:Bridge Street (02100005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.6, Target = 87.9CPI = 78.6, Target = 87.9CPI = 78.6, Target = 87.9 79.2 75.9 78.6 2.7 87.9 89.6 2410450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 69.1, Target = 82.9CPI = 69.1, Target = 82.9CPI = 69.1, Target = 82.9 70.7 60.8 69.1 8.3 82.9 85.4 225150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.1, Target = 63.9CPI = 68.1, Target = 63.9CPI = 68.1, Target = 63.9 60.6 60.6 68.1 7.5 63.9 80.3 1729100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.6, Target = 73.2CPI = 67.6, Target = 73.2CPI = 67.6, Target = 73.2 54.0 54.3 67.6 13.3 73.2 77.0 603450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.1, Target = 90.4CPI = 81.1, Target = 90.4CPI = 81.1, Target = 90.4 83.5 79.8 81.1 1.3 90.4 91.8 177050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.2, Target = 79.9CPI = 76.2, Target = 79.9CPI = 76.2, Target = 79.9 65.5 73.0 76.2 3.2 79.9 82.8 1810450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.7, Target = 72.4CPI = 62.7, Target = 72.4CPI = 62.7, Target = 72.4 52.7 57.4 62.7 5.3 72.4 76.4 85150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 64.2, Target = 61.3CPI = 64.2, Target = 61.3CPI = 64.2, Target = 61.3 57.8 57.8 64.2 6.4 61.3 78.9 1130100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.6, Target = 64.4CPI = 57.6, Target = 64.4CPI = 57.6, Target = 64.4 39.0 53.8 57.6 3.8 64.4 69.5 303350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 79.2, Target = 83.2CPI = 79.2, Target = 83.2CPI = 79.2, Target = 83.2 71.2 75.6 79.2 3.6 83.2 85.6 137150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73, Target = 82.5CPI = 73, Target = 82.5CPI = 73, Target = 82.5 70.0 75.6 73.0 -2.6 82.5 85.0 29380Declined
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.1, Target = 87.9CPI = 78.1, Target = 87.9CPI = 78.1, Target = 87.9 79.2 80.1 78.1 -2.0 87.9 89.6 242425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 6.1 5.81040 14.0 6.710425
High needs 5.7 2.0510 26.4 11.85125
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.1 3.4290 30.3 13.82925
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 0.0340 28.6 14.73425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.1 5.7700 11.9 7.17025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.8 22.110425 19.5 14.410425
High needs 11.8 9.8510 35.3 27.55125
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.6 13.3300 34.4 23.33025
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 3.0 6.13325 39.4 42.4330
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.0 26.87125 17.9 14.17125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.1 2.6380 13.6 15.8380
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.8 4.2240 11.8 8.32425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 30.5 47.0 16.5 51.0No67100Above Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 29.0 44.0 15.0 51.0No33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-0--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 26.5 48.0 21.5 51.0No49100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 58.0 66.0 8.0 51.0No67100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 56.0 65.5 9.5 51.0No32100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-0--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 56.5 65.0 8.5 51.0No49100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students11511096Yes11511096Yes4141100Yes
High needs595797Yes595797Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged363597Yes373697Yes14---
EL and Former EL10---10---2---
Students w/ disabilities393897Yes383797Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian8---8---3---
Afr. Amer./Black4---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino20---20---12---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White787397Yes797497Yes2525100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles