Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Brayton
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Brayton
Organization Information
District:North Adams (02090000)School type:Elementary-Middle School
School:Brayton (02090035)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83, Target = 84.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83, Target = 84.5 75 or Higher All Students 73.5 75.2 83.0 7.8 84.5 86.8 5216550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.4, Target = 81.6 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 80.4, Target = 81.6 75 or Higher High needs 68.4 71.6 80.4 8.8 81.6 84.2 6812175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.8, Target = 74.8 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 81.8, Target = 74.8CPI = 81.8, Target = 74.875 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 72.5 72.5 81.8 9.3 74.8 86.3 72111100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.5, Target = 72.6 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-CPI = 74.5, Target = 72.6CPI = 74.5, Target = 72.675 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 53.1 60.4 74.5 14.1 72.6 76.6 8052100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.5, Target = 85 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.5, Target = 85 75 or Higher White 74.2 76.1 83.5 7.4 85.0 87.1 2413850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.3, Target = 77.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 75.3, Target = 77.8 75 or Higher All Students 61.9 71.7 75.3 3.6 77.8 81.0 4716550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.1, Target = 76.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 71.1, Target = 76.3 75 or Higher High needs 59.3 69.1 71.1 2.0 76.3 79.7 6312150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.2, Target = 72.6 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 71.2, Target = 72.6 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 70.1 70.1 71.2 1.1 72.6 85.1 6111150Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.9, Target = 72.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 64.9, Target = 72.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 53.0 62.3 64.9 2.6 72.6 76.5 795250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 75.4, Target = 77.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 75.4, Target = 77.8 75 or Higher White 61.9 71.4 75.4 4.0 77.8 81.0 2213850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 70.2, Target = 79.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 70.2, Target = 79.1 75 or Higher All Students 64.1 58.8 70.2 11.4 79.1 82.1 624250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.5, Target = 77.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 67.5, Target = 77.3 75 or Higher High needs 61.1 55.6 67.5 11.9 77.3 80.6 783050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.2, Target = 58.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 69.2, Target = 58.6CPI = 69.2, Target = 58.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 54.8 54.8 69.2 14.4 58.6 77.4 9226100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 72.3, Target = 79.9 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 72.3, Target = 79.9 75 or Higher White 65.5 61.2 72.3 11.1 79.9 82.8 313750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.7 6.116525 10.6 8.516525
High needs 0.6 4.112125 12.3 10.712125
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.7 1.811125 11.2 9.011125
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 5.85225 23.9 21.25225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.4 5.813825 10.4 8.713825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.0 20.016525 16.5 13.316525
High needs 8.0 13.212125 18.5 16.512125
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.6 13.511125 17.1 17.11110
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 4.5 11.55225 29.9 23.15225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.8 22.513825 16.9 13.013825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 2.44225 23.5 9.54225
High needs 0.0 0.0300 29.6 13.33025
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0260 30.8 11.52625
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 2.73725 20.7 8.13725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 38.0 44.5 6.5 51.0Yes12075On Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 37.0 45.0 8.0 51.0Yes8975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 45, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 38.0 45.0 7.0 51.0Yes8175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 57, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 41.0 57.0 16.0 51.0Yes34100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 40.0 46.0 6.0 51.0Yes10175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 42, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 37.5 42.0 4.5 51.0Yes12075On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 37.0 43.0 6.0 51.0Yes8975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 39, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 39, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 37.5 39.0 1.5 51.0No8150Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 59.5, Target = 51 - Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities-SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 5175 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 26.0 59.5 33.5 51.0No34100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 38.5 43.0 4.5 51.0Yes10175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01.00-
High needs- 60.01.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.01.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students173173100Yes17317299Yes4545100Yes
High needs128128100Yes12812799Yes3333100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged116116100Yes116116100Yes2828100Yes
EL and Former EL2---2---1---
Students w/ disabilities5656100Yes565598Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White143143100Yes14314299Yes3838100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles