Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Freeman-Kennedy School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Freeman-Kennedy School
Organization Information
District:Norfolk (02080000)School type:Elementary School
School:Freeman-Kennedy School (02080005)Grades served:03,04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94, Target = 96.7CPI = 94, Target = 96.7CPI = 94, Target = 96.7 94.3 94.0 94.0 0.0 96.7 97.2 8947075On Target
High needsCPI = 79.2, Target = 89.1CPI = 79.2, Target = 89.1CPI = 79.2, Target = 89.1 81.3 78.4 79.2 0.8 89.1 90.7 679050Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  89.6---- 94.8-27--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.4, Target = 87.5CPI = 75.4, Target = 87.5CPI = 75.4, Target = 87.5 78.6 74.3 75.4 1.1 87.5 89.3 787050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.2, Target = 96.7CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.7CPI = 94.2, Target = 96.7 94.3 94.6 94.2 -0.4 96.7 97.2 86428100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.2, Target = 94.8CPI = 92.2, Target = 94.8CPI = 92.2, Target = 94.8 91.0 91.8 92.2 0.4 94.8 95.5 8147075On Target
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 87.5CPI = 75, Target = 87.5CPI = 75, Target = 87.5 78.5 74.5 75.0 0.5 87.5 89.3 469050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.9, Target = 82.4CPI = 76.9, Target = 82.4CPI = 76.9, Target = 82.4 80.8 80.8 76.9 -3.9 82.4 90.4 5227--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.1, Target = 86.4CPI = 71.1, Target = 86.4CPI = 71.1, Target = 86.4 76.7 70.7 71.1 0.4 86.4 88.4 687050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 92.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 92.3, Target = 94.9 91.2 92.5 92.3 -0.2 94.9 95.6 7642875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 94.2CPI = 91, Target = 94.2CPI = 91, Target = 94.2 90.1 91.7 91.0 -0.7 94.2 95.1 8711175On Target
High needs  79.5---- 89.8-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.3, Target = 94CPI = 91.3, Target = 94CPI = 91.3, Target = 94 89.7 91.9 91.3 -0.6 94.0 94.9 8210075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.4 28.747025 2.7 2.147025
High needs 6.3 6.7900 11.6 8.99025
Econ. Disadvantaged--27---27-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 1.4700 14.5 11.47025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.0 29.942825 2.5 2.34280
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 44.5 42.64700 2.4 1.747025
High needs 15.6 11.1900 11.5 8.99025
Econ. Disadvantaged 30.8 18.527- 3.8 11.127-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 8.0 4.3700 14.7 10.07025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--13---13-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 44.6 43.24280 2.0 1.642825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.0 15.31110 1.6 1.81110
High needs--22---22-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.7 17.01000 1.7 2.01000
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 52.0 62.0 10.0 51.0No358100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 54.0 60.0 6.0 51.0No63100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 47.0 60.0 13.0 51.0No53100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 52.0 62.0 10.0 51.0No332100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 51.0 55.0 4.0 51.0No35975On Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 53.0 59.0 6.0 51.0No6275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 53.0 55.5 2.5 51.0No5075On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 50.0 54.0 4.0 51.0No33375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students476475100Yes477477100Yes113113100Yes
High needs908999Yes9191100Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2727100Yes2828100Yes9---
EL and Former EL4---4-------
Students w/ disabilities7070100Yes7070100Yes17---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---1---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---3---
Hispanic/Latino18---18---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White431430100Yes432432100Yes102102100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles