Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Underwood
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Underwood
Organization Information
District:Newton (02070000)School type:Elementary School
School:Underwood (02070115)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.3, Target = 98.1CPI = 91.3, Target = 98.1CPI = 91.3, Target = 98.1 96.8 86.2 91.3 5.1 98.1 98.4 7616050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 82.3, Target = 94.9CPI = 82.3, Target = 94.9 91.3 68.4 82.3 13.9 94.9 95.7 795850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------19--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 95.3CPI = 75, Target = 95.3CPI = 75, Target = 95.3 92.0 62.8 75.0 12.2 95.3 96.0 773550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------24--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.6, Target = 99.2CPI = 91.6, Target = 99.2CPI = 91.6, Target = 99.2 98.7 86.8 91.6 4.8 99.2 99.4 7010750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 98CPI = 90.6, Target = 98CPI = 90.6, Target = 98 96.6 88.9 90.6 1.7 98.0 98.3 7415950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 81.9, Target = 95.9CPI = 81.9, Target = 95.9CPI = 81.9, Target = 95.9 93.0 73.2 81.9 8.7 95.9 96.5 755850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------19--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.6, Target = 94.8CPI = 73.6, Target = 94.8CPI = 73.6, Target = 94.8 91.0 69.2 73.6 4.4 94.8 95.5 743550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------24--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 98.8CPI = 92, Target = 98.8CPI = 92, Target = 98.8 98.0 90.6 92.0 1.4 98.8 99.0 7510650Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.8, Target = 94.7CPI = 82.8, Target = 94.7CPI = 82.8, Target = 94.7 90.9 82.9 82.8 -0.1 94.7 95.5 575825No Change
High needs -------23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.7, Target = 93.1CPI = 85.7, Target = 93.1CPI = 85.7, Target = 93.1 88.1 84.9 85.7 0.8 93.1 94.1 533550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.4 20.616025 6.6 3.816025
High needs 0.0 6.95825 19.3 8.65825
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--19---19-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.93525 25.6 14.33525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--24---24-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.6 21.51070 7.5 2.810725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 38.9 47.815925 4.8 5.01590
High needs 12.3 27.65825 14.0 10.35825
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--19---19-
Students w/ disabilities 4.7 17.13525 18.6 17.1350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--24---24-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.5 50.010625 4.7 3.810625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.0 15.5580 5.0 3.45825
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.8 17.1350 5.3 0.03525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 56.5 63.0 6.5 51.0Yes103100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 36.0 65.5 29.5 51.0Yes42100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 32.5 47.0 14.5 51.0Yes29100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-18--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 61.5 60.5 -1.0 51.0Yes66100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 52.0 53.0 1.0 51.0Yes10375On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 24.0 49.0 25.0 51.0Yes42100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 19.0 45.0 26.0 51.0Yes29100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-18--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 52.0 56.0 4.0 51.0Yes6675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 94.0 60.02625
High needs 94.0 60.02625
EL and Former EL- 60.026-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16616599Yes16616499Yes5959100Yes
High needs6262100Yes6262100Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged21---21---9---
EL and Former EL22---22---7---
Students w/ disabilities3737100Yes3737100Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian24---24---11---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---3---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White109109100Yes10910899Yes3535100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles