Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Horace Mann
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Horace Mann
Organization Information
District:Newton (02070000)School type:Elementary School
School:Horace Mann (02070075)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 92.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 92.3, Target = 96.7 94.3 87.3 92.3 5.0 96.7 97.2 8021575On Target
High needsCPI = 83.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.3, Target = 92.8 87.7 75.0 83.3 8.3 92.8 93.9 828150Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL  86.0---- 93.0-28--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77, Target = 91.7CPI = 77, Target = 91.7CPI = 77, Target = 91.7 85.8 67.8 77.0 9.2 91.7 92.9 835050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 94.7, Target = 97.5CPI = 94.7, Target = 97.5CPI = 94.7, Target = 97.5 95.7 88.2 94.7 6.5 97.5 97.9 5438100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.2, Target = 97.7CPI = 92.2, Target = 97.7CPI = 92.2, Target = 97.7 96.1 90.0 92.2 2.2 97.7 98.1 7414175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.8, Target = 96.3CPI = 90.8, Target = 96.3CPI = 90.8, Target = 96.3 93.6 88.9 90.8 1.9 96.3 96.8 7520950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 83.2, Target = 90.4CPI = 83.2, Target = 90.4CPI = 83.2, Target = 90.4 83.5 78.2 83.2 5.0 90.4 91.8 817950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL  97.1---- 98.6-27--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 76.5, Target = 88.7CPI = 76.5, Target = 88.7CPI = 76.5, Target = 88.7 80.7 70.1 76.5 6.4 88.7 90.4 804950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 98, Target = 98.1CPI = 98, Target = 98.1 96.7 95.3 98.0 2.7 98.1 98.4 7637100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.7, Target = 97.7CPI = 89.7, Target = 97.7CPI = 89.7, Target = 97.7 96.1 90.5 89.7 -0.8 97.7 98.1 6113625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89, Target = 93.2CPI = 89, Target = 93.2CPI = 89, Target = 93.2 88.4 82.6 89.0 6.4 93.2 94.2 806875On Target
High needs  72.6---- 86.3-30--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.9, Target = 95.9CPI = 86.9, Target = 95.9CPI = 86.9, Target = 95.9 92.9 84.7 86.9 2.2 95.9 96.5 604250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.4 20.921525 4.1 2.321525
High needs 3.9 8.68125 10.4 6.28125
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.05025 13.3 10.05025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 10.5 26.33825 5.3 0.03825
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.9 19.914125 1.5 2.81410
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.3 51.220925 5.1 3.320925
High needs 20.8 32.97925 13.0 8.97925
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--27---27-
Students w/ disabilities 13.0 16.34925 21.7 14.34925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 62.2 70.33725 0.0 0.03725
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.3 50.013625 2.9 4.41360
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.2 22.16825 3.0 1.56825
High needs--30---30-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.4 16.7420 2.8 2.44225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 37.5 66.0 28.5 51.0Yes145100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 31.0 58.0 27.0 51.0Yes56100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-17--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-38--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-24--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 35.5 66.0 30.5 51.0Yes98100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 55.0 67.0 12.0 51.0No143100Above Target
High needsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 49.0 67.0 18.0 51.0Yes55100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 22.0 63.5 41.5 51.0No38100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-23--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 52.0 63.0 11.0 51.0No97100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 90.0 60.03425
High needs 90.0 60.03425
EL and Former EL 90.0 60.034-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students221221100Yes22121597Yes6969100Yes
High needs8787100Yes878598Yes3131100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged24---24---6---
EL and Former EL3333100Yes333297Yes12---
Students w/ disabilities5151100Yes515098Yes18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4242100Yes424198Yes17---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino18---18---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White143143100Yes14313897Yes4242100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles