Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Franklin

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Franklin

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.9, Target = 94.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89.9, Target = 94.3 75 or Higher All Students 90.2 85.5 89.9 4.4 94.3 95.1 6918550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.7, Target = 86.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 80.7, Target = 86.8 75 or Higher High needs 77.4 76.4 80.7 4.3 86.8 88.7 736650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------20--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.6, Target = 80.6 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 75.6, Target = 80.6 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 66.7 63.4 75.6 12.2 80.6 83.4 794550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.1, Target = 94.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 92.1, Target = 94.8 75 or Higher White 91.0 86.1 92.1 6.0 94.8 95.5 7312750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.8, Target = 94.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 86.8, Target = 94.6 75 or Higher All Students 90.8 87.2 86.8 -0.4 94.6 95.4 5518625No Change
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 86.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 73.9, Target = 86.5 75 or Higher High needs 76.8 77.7 73.9 -3.8 86.5 88.4 41670Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.4, Target = 81.1 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 67.4, Target = 81.1 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 67.6 66.1 67.4 1.3 81.1 83.8 594650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88, Target = 96.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88, Target = 96.2 75 or Higher White 93.4 88.3 88.0 -0.3 96.2 96.7 5012725No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.5, Target = 92.1 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.5, Target = 92.1 75 or Higher All Students 86.5 86.2 84.5 -1.7 92.1 93.3 625025No Change
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.4, Target = 93.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.4, Target = 93.6 75 or Higher White 89.0 86.3 84.4 -1.9 93.6 94.5 483225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 16.0 23.818525 5.9 2.718525
High needs 9.1 13.66625 10.9 6.16625
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--20---20-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 6.74525 21.4 8.94525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.3 22.812725 5.6 1.612725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 42.0 46.818625 5.3 7.51860
High needs 29.1 29.9670 10.9 17.9670
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 10.7 19.64625 21.4 23.9460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.1 47.212725 4.8 7.11270
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 13.4 16.05025 6.0 8.0500
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.8 21.93225 4.8 9.4320
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 33.0 64.0 31.0 51.0Yes115100Above Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 46, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 24.5 46.0 21.5 51.0No33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 27.0 62.5 35.5 51.0Yes78100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 44.5 52.5 8.0 51.0Yes11675On Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 42, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 45.0 42.0 -3.0 51.0No3450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 52.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 42.5 52.5 10.0 51.0No7875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 93.0 60.025.0025
High needs 93.0 60.025.0025
EL and Former EL- 60.025.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19018899Yes18918899Yes5151100Yes
High needs706999Yes6969100Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged22---21---6---
EL and Former EL23---22---6---
Students w/ disabilities464598Yes4646100Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian23---23---6---
Afr. Amer./Black9---9---4---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White130130100Yes129129100Yes3333100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles