Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Countryside

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Countryside

Organization Information

District:

Newton (02070000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Countryside (02070040)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.0	90.0	92.8	2.8	93.6	94.5	84	229	75	On Target
High needs		80.5	78.8	83.4	4.6	88.6	90.3	83	95	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
EL and Former EL		78.0	79.9	82.7	2.8	87.2	89.0	83	42	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		78.4	69.7	77.5	7.8	87.4	89.2	84	60	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		89.1	91.3	94.8	3.5	93.6	94.6	56	53	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.0	90.8	95.3	4.5	95.3	96.0	93	132	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.6	91.4	91.6	0.2	96.3	96.8	78	228	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		87.2	83.2	81.6	-1.6	92.5	93.6	74	95	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
EL and Former EL		88.1	82.9	86.3	3.4	93.1	94.1	82	42	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		84.3	76.0	72.9	-3.1	90.8	92.2	72	60	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		94.4	96.8	95.8	-1.0	96.7	97.2	48	53	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.3	92.9	93.1	0.2	97.8	98.2	81	131	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.4	87.2	82.7	-4.5	93.8	94.7	56	84	0	Declined
High needs		80.4	77.1	60.8	-16.3	88.6	90.2	28	30	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		82.1	76.0	46.4	-29.6	85.1	91.1	12	21	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		88.6	88.9	93.8	4.9	93.4	94.3	50	20	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.0	88.8	80.7	-8.1	93.6	94.5	30	48	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	21.8	34.1	229	25	4.0	3.1	229	25
High needs	7.7	17.9	95	25	8.8	7.4	95	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
EL and Former EL	7.3	26.2	42	25	9.8	7.1	42	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.8	6.7	60	25	15.4	11.7	60	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	27.0	34.0	53	25	4.8	0.0	53	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.3	33.3	132	25	3.5	0.0	132	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	47.6	50.9	228	0	3.2	5.7	228	0
High needs	29.7	25.3	95	0	8.8	13.7	95	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
EL and Former EL	41.5	38.1	42	0	7.3	4.8	42	25
Students w/ disabilities	11.5	11.7	60	0	13.5	21.7	60	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	60.3	69.8	53	25	0.0	1.9	53	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	44.0	45.0	131	0	0.7	3.8	131	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	29.3	29.8	84	0	1.1	15.5	84	0
High needs	13.9	6.7	30	0	2.8	43.3	30	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	8.0	4.8	21	0	4.0	61.9	21	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	29.6	30.0	20	0	0.0	5.0	20	0
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	34.7	31.3	48	0	0.0	16.7	48	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		55.0	71.0	16.0	51.0	Yes	150	100	Above Target
High needs		57.0	67.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	62	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		44.0	57.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	40	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		60.0	67.5	7.5	51.0	Yes	36	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		52.5	75.0	22.5	51.0	Yes	84	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.0	55.0	6.0	51.0	Yes	149	75	On Target
High needs		39.5	52.0	12.5	51.0	No	61	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	26	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		28.0	49.0	21.0	51.0	Yes	39	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		55.5	60.0	4.5	51.0	No	36	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.0	52.5	4.5	51.0	Yes	84	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	83.0	60.0	49.00	25
High needs	83.0	60.0	49.00	25
EL and Former EL	83.0	60.0	49.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	239	234	98	Yes	239	233	97	Yes	88	85	97	Yes
High needs	102	100	98	Yes	102	100	98	Yes	33	31	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	12	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	48	47	98	Yes	48	47	98	Yes	14	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	62	60	97	Yes	62	60	97	Yes	23	21	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	56	56	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes	21	21	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	11	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	138	133	96	Yes	138	132	96	Yes	51	48	97	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.