Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Betsey B Winslow
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Betsey B Winslow
Organization Information
District:New Bedford (02010000)School type:Elementary School
School:Betsey B Winslow (02010140)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.4, Target = 88.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.4, Target = 88.2 75 or Higher All Students 79.8 86.3 85.4 -0.9 88.2 89.9 4913725No Change
High needsCPI = 75.8, Target = 81.4 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75.8, Target = 81.4 75 or Higher High needs 68.1 76.9 75.8 -1.1 81.4 84.1 506525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.5, Target = 81.4 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 78.5, Target = 81.4 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 79.7 79.7 78.5 -1.2 81.4 89.9 575025No Change
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.7, Target = 89.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.7, Target = 89.7 75 or Higher White 82.3 89.4 86.7 -2.7 89.7 91.2 42940Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83, Target = 88.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83, Target = 88.8 75 or Higher All Students 80.8 80.0 83.0 3.0 88.8 90.4 3913750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 85.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 75, Target = 85.2 75 or Higher High needs 74.6 70.4 75.0 4.6 85.2 87.3 466550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.5, Target = 78.9 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 79.5, Target = 78.975 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 77.0 77.0 79.5 2.5 78.9 88.5 655075On Target
EL and Former EL -------13--
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.8, Target = 88.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 84.8, Target = 88.7 75 or Higher White 80.6 82.8 84.8 2.0 88.7 90.3 329450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.6, Target = 84.9 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 72.6, Target = 84.9 75 or Higher All Students 74.1 63.9 72.6 8.7 84.9 87.1 284150Improved Below Target
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  81.0---- 90.5-31--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.1 14.613725 4.8 5.11370
High needs 1.9 6.26525 11.1 9.26525
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.7 8.05025 10.8 6.05025
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.4 19.19425 3.3 6.4940
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.1 29.913725 7.1 8.01370
High needs 11.1 18.56525 11.1 15.4650
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.2 22.05025 8.1 10.0500
EL and Former EL--13---13-
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.6 34.09425 3.3 7.4940
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.1 2.4410 22.2 19.54125
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--31---31-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 59.5 43.0 -16.5 51.0No7650Below Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 36, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 50.0 36.0 -14.0 51.0No3225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 66.0 43.0 -23.0 51.0No5650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 34, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 34, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 43.0 34.0 -9.0 51.0Yes7675On Target
High needsSGP = 30.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 30.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 38.0 30.5 -7.5 51.0Yes3275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 38, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 47.0 38.0 -9.0 51.0Yes5675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 68.0 60.020.0025
High needs 68.0 60.020.0025
EL and Former EL- 60.020.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14514298Yes14514298Yes454498Yes
High needs706897Yes706897Yes17---
Econ. Disadvantaged535196Yes535196Yes12---
EL and Former EL15---15---3---
Students w/ disabilities24---24---7---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8---8---2---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---3---
Hispanic/Latino19---19---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.10---10-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White989597Yes989597Yes333297Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles