Massachusetts School and District Profiles

William H Taylor

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - William H Taylor

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.5, Target = 85.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 83.5, Target = 85.7 75 or Higher All Students 75.5 86.2 83.5 -2.7 85.7 87.8 40910Declined
High needsCPI = 76.8, Target = 83.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.8, Target = 83.2 75 or Higher High needs 71.2 82.1 76.8 -5.3 83.2 85.6 55570Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77, Target = 83.6 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 77, Target = 83.6 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 82.1 82.1 77.0 -5.1 83.6 91.1 51490Declined
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.5, Target = 86.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 81.5, Target = 86.3 75 or Higher White 76.5 86.6 81.5 -5.1 86.3 88.3 18690Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.7, Target = 89.9 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 90.7, Target = 89.975 or Higher All Students 82.7 91.1 90.7 -0.4 89.9 91.4 759175On Target
High needsCPI = 86.8, Target = 87.2 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 86.8, Target = 87.275 or Higher High needs 78.1 87.9 86.8 -1.1 87.2 89.1 915775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.7, Target = 89 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 85.7, Target = 89 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 88.0 88.0 85.7 -2.3 89.0 94.0 874925No Change
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.9, Target = 90.8 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 90.9, Target = 90.875 or Higher White 84.3 92.3 90.9 -1.4 90.8 92.2 686975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78, Target = 86.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 78, Target = 86.7 75 or Higher All Students 77.2 87.0 78.0 -9.0 86.7 88.6 40250Declined
High needs -------13--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 4.2 3.3910 1.0 4.4910
High needs 1.8 1.8570 1.8 7.0570
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.04925 2.2 8.2490
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.2 2.9690 0.0 4.3690
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.0 30.89125 2.1 2.2910
High needs 23.2 21.1570 3.6 3.5570
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.7 22.4490 4.3 4.1490
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.5 33.36925 2.8 1.46925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.7 0.0250 4.3 8.0250
High needs--13---13-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--3---3-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 38, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 63.0 38.0 -25.0 51.0No5725Below Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 38, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 63.0 38.0 -25.0 51.0No3625Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 63.0 37.0 -26.0 51.0No4125Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 75.0 41.0 -34.0 51.0No5750Below Target
High needsSGP = 41.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 74.0 41.5 -32.5 51.0No3650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-29--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 79.0 40.0 -39.0 51.0No4125Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017.00-
High needs- 60.017.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.017.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9797100Yes9797100Yes2626100Yes
High needs6262100Yes6262100Yes14---
Econ. Disadvantaged5454100Yes5454100Yes11---
EL and Former EL17---17---4---
Students w/ disabilities19---19---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White7171100Yes7171100Yes18---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles