Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Jireh Swift

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Jireh Swift

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.5, Target = 88 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 87.5, Target = 8875 or Higher All Students 79.4 86.9 87.5 0.6 88.0 89.7 598875On Target
High needsCPI = 83.7, Target = 84.3 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 83.7, Target = 84.375 or Higher High needs 73.0 82.9 83.7 0.8 84.3 86.5 834375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.8, Target = 85.1 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 83.8, Target = 85.1 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 83.7 83.7 83.8 0.1 85.1 91.9 833750Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.8, Target = 87.9 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 89.8, Target = 87.9CPI = 89.8, Target = 87.975 or Higher White 79.3 87.7 89.8 2.1 87.9 89.7 6064100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.4, Target = 84.5 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 84.4, Target = 84.575 or Higher All Students 73.5 80.1 84.4 4.3 84.5 86.8 468875On Target
High needsCPI = 83.7, Target = 81.9 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 83.7, Target = 81.9CPI = 83.7, Target = 81.975 or Higher High needs 69.0 76.9 83.7 6.8 81.9 84.5 8243100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.5, Target = 80.6 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 84.5, Target = 80.6CPI = 84.5, Target = 80.675 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 78.8 78.8 84.5 5.7 80.6 89.4 8337100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.8, Target = 85.1 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 84.8, Target = 85.175 or Higher White 74.4 81.0 84.8 3.8 85.1 87.2 326475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73, Target = 82.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 73, Target = 82.3 75 or Higher All Students 69.6 73.4 73.0 -0.4 82.3 84.8 292525No Change
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------17--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 7.5 11.48825 2.8 2.38825
High needs 5.6 9.34325 3.7 2.34325
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.5 10.83725 4.3 2.73725
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.9 12.56425 2.5 3.1640
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 7.5 25.08825 3.7 3.4880
High needs 5.6 20.94325 5.6 2.34325
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.5 18.93725 4.3 0.03725
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.9 31.36425 3.8 4.7640
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 3.2 0.0250 3.2 4.0250
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--17---17-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 36, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 53.0 36.0 -17.0 51.0No5425Below Target
High needsSGP = 32.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 46.0 32.5 -13.5 51.0No2825Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 58.0 41.0 -17.0 51.0Yes3675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 41, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 41, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 46.0 41.0 -5.0 51.0Yes5475On Target
High needsSGP = 43.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 45.5 43.5 -2.0 51.0Yes2875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 46.0 43.0 -3.0 51.0Yes3675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.08.00-
High needs- 60.08.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.08.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students1088991No1099091No302795Yes
High needs514493No524594No18---
Econ. Disadvantaged453892No463993No16---
EL and Former EL11---12---3---
Students w/ disabilities8---8---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---3---
Hispanic/Latino18---18---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White836488No836488No20---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles