Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Elwyn G Campbell
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Elwyn G Campbell
Organization Information
District:New Bedford (02010000)School type:Elementary School
School:Elwyn G Campbell (02010020)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.5, Target = 89.3CPI = 75.5, Target = 89.3CPI = 75.5, Target = 89.3 81.7 76.2 75.5 -0.7 89.3 90.9 179225No Change
High needsCPI = 72.5, Target = 87.1CPI = 72.5, Target = 87.1CPI = 72.5, Target = 87.1 77.8 72.6 72.5 -0.1 87.1 88.9 346925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.8, Target = 75.3CPI = 72.8, Target = 75.3CPI = 72.8, Target = 75.3 73.1 73.1 72.8 -0.3 75.3 86.6 315825No Change
EL and Former EL -------28--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 69, Target = 85CPI = 69, Target = 85CPI = 69, Target = 85 74.2 70.1 69.0 -1.1 85.0 87.1 344625No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.1, Target = 92.5CPI = 80.1, Target = 92.5CPI = 80.1, Target = 92.5 87.2 82.7 80.1 -2.6 92.5 93.6 15390Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.6, Target = 90CPI = 81.6, Target = 90CPI = 81.6, Target = 90 82.9 74.7 81.6 6.9 90.0 91.5 329150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79, Target = 87.5CPI = 79, Target = 87.5CPI = 79, Target = 87.5 78.6 74.2 79.0 4.8 87.5 89.3 646950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.9, Target = 76.3CPI = 78.9, Target = 76.3CPI = 78.9, Target = 76.3 74.1 74.1 78.9 4.8 76.3 87.1 6258100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------28--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 78.3, Target = 86.4CPI = 78.3, Target = 86.4CPI = 78.3, Target = 86.4 76.7 72.0 78.3 6.3 86.4 88.4 704650Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.5, Target = 92.9CPI = 85.5, Target = 92.9CPI = 85.5, Target = 92.9 87.8 78.2 85.5 7.3 92.9 93.9 373850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 55.4, Target = 81.5CPI = 55.4, Target = 81.5CPI = 55.4, Target = 81.5 68.3 61.0 55.4 -5.6 81.5 84.2 9230Declined
High needs  72.2---- 86.1-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------8--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.7 9.89225 12.8 17.4920
High needs 3.2 7.26925 14.5 18.8690
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.8 8.65825 15.4 19.0580
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino 2.4 6.54625 12.2 19.6460
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.7 12.83925 12.8 17.9390
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.8 15.49125 4.6 7.7910
High needs 7.9 11.66925 4.8 8.7690
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.4 13.85825 5.7 10.3580
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino 2.4 8.74625 9.5 8.7460
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.6 23.7380 0.0 5.3380
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0230 20.6 17.42325
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--8---8-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 47.0 28.0 -19.0 51.0No540Below Target
High needsSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 47.0 30.0 -17.0 51.0Yes4175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 48.0 28.0 -20.0 51.0Yes3275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-21--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 47.0 30.0 -17.0 51.0No200Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 44.5 36.0 -8.5 51.0Yes5375On Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 44.0 38.0 -6.0 51.0Yes4175On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 44.0 33.5 -10.5 51.0Yes3275On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-21--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-19--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 63.0 60.02525
High needs 63.0 60.02525
EL and Former EL 63.0 60.025-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students969599Yes969498Yes2323100Yes
High needs737299Yes737299Yes2020100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged626198Yes626198Yes14---
EL and Former EL3030100Yes3030100Yes11---
Students w/ disabilities15---15---6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino4848100Yes4848100Yes11---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White403998Yes403895Yes8---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles