Massachusetts School and District Profiles

High Rock School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - High Rock School
Organization Information
District:Needham (01990000)School type:Middle School
School:High Rock School (01990410)Grades served:06
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.9, Target = 98.4CPI = 96.9, Target = 98.4CPI = 96.9, Target = 98.4 97.2 95.2 96.9 1.7 98.4 98.6 92446100Above Target
High needsCPI = 89.4, Target = 94.5CPI = 89.4, Target = 94.5CPI = 89.4, Target = 94.5 90.6 83.7 89.4 5.7 94.5 95.3 9210175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 88.4, Target = 92.8CPI = 88.4, Target = 92.8CPI = 88.4, Target = 92.8 87.7 82.4 88.4 6.0 92.8 93.9 968875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
AsianCPI = 98.1, Target = 100CPI = 98.1, Target = 100CPI = 98.1, Target = 100 100.0 94.7 98.1 3.4 100.0 100.0 7239100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.1, Target = 98.5CPI = 97.1, Target = 98.5CPI = 97.1, Target = 98.5 97.4 95.5 97.1 1.6 98.5 98.7 91357100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 95.1, Target = 95.9 92.9 93.8 95.1 1.3 95.9 96.5 98447100Above Target
High needsCPI = 81.5, Target = 86.7CPI = 81.5, Target = 86.7CPI = 81.5, Target = 86.7 77.2 79.7 81.5 1.8 86.7 88.6 9710075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.7, Target = 83.5CPI = 78.7, Target = 83.5CPI = 78.7, Target = 83.5 71.7 78.1 78.7 0.6 83.5 85.9 998775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
AsianCPI = 98.1, Target = 99.4CPI = 98.1, Target = 99.4CPI = 98.1, Target = 99.4 98.9 97.1 98.1 1.0 99.4 99.5 8639100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.5, Target = 96.7CPI = 95.5, Target = 96.7CPI = 95.5, Target = 96.7 94.4 94.4 95.5 1.1 96.7 97.2 99358100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.2 38.644625 1.8 0.944625
High needs 3.0 10.910125 6.9 4.010125
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 1.1 6.88825 8.0 4.58825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian 42.4 43.6390 6.1 0.03925
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--25---25-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.0 37.335725 1.6 0.835725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 54.9 62.644725 3.2 2.044725
High needs 21.6 22.01000 12.7 8.010025
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 20.5 18.4870 14.8 9.28725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian 79.4 71.8390 2.9 0.03925
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--26---26-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 53.0 63.135825 2.7 2.035825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 59.0 60.0 1.0 51.0Yes427100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 61.0 56.0 -5.0 51.0Yes9475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 59.0 58.0 -1.0 51.0Yes8275On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
AsianSGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 51 79.0 76.0 -3.0 51.0Yes37100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 58.5 57.0 -1.5 51.0Yes34175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 79, Target = 51SGP = 79, Target = 51SGP = 79, Target = 51 71.5 79.0 7.5 51.0Yes428100Above Target
High needsSGP = 80, Target = 51SGP = 80, Target = 51SGP = 80, Target = 51 68.0 80.0 12.0 51.0Yes93100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 51 68.0 78.0 10.0 51.0No81100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
AsianSGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 51 77.0 77.0 0.0 51.0Yes37100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 80, Target = 51SGP = 80, Target = 51SGP = 80, Target = 51 72.0 80.0 8.0 51.0Yes342100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students45345099Yes452451100Yes----
High needs102102100Yes10210199Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20-------
EL and Former EL9---9-------
Students w/ disabilities8888100Yes888799Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2-------
Asian4242100Yes4242100Yes----
Afr. Amer./Black10---9-------
Hispanic/Latino14---14-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.262596Yes2626100Yes----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White35935799Yes359358100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles