Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nantucket Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Nantucket Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Nantucket (01970000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Nantucket Elementary (01970005)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.1	71.8	75.2	3.4	89.0	90.6	16	328	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		65.4	58.7	64.3	5.6	79.8	82.7	9	154	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.8	64.8	68.4	3.6	67.7	82.4	18	87	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		61.2	51.4	62.9	11.5	77.4	80.6	25	70	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		62.8	44.4	49.3	4.9	78.3	81.4	13	37	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		67.5	59.7	65.4	5.7	81.0	83.8	20	34	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		67.1	56.2	64.2	8.0	80.8	83.6	18	93	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.3	79.2	80.9	1.7	92.0	93.2	16	185	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.4	72.6	79.4	6.8	86.2	88.2	25	328	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		61.9	60.5	67.7	7.2	77.8	81.0	19	154	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		63.1	63.1	70.1	7.0	66.2	81.6	25	87	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		59.5	52.4	58.6	6.2	76.4	79.8	10	70	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		58.8	54.9	73.0	18.1	76.0	79.4	72	37	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		59.4	60.5	70.6	10.1	76.3	79.7	44	34	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		64.0	55.5	64.8	9.3	79.0	82.0	20	93	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		82.1	81.8	87.2	5.4	89.6	91.1	45	185	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.7	73.0	70.2	-2.8	85.2	87.4	23	110	0	Declined
High needs		63.3	59.0	58.8	-0.2	78.6	81.7	25	51	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		67.5	-	-	-	-	83.8	-	34	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	28	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		80.6	81.1	80.9	-0.2	88.7	90.3	30	64	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.8	6.1	328	25	16.3	14.3	328	25
High needs	0.7	3.2	154	25	28.1	26.0	154	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.2	3.4	87	25	21.0	18.4	87	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	2.9	70	25	32.7	24.3	70	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	37	0	55.0	51.4	37	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3.2	0.0	34	0	22.6	23.5	34	0
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	2.2	93	25	26.0	20.4	93	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	6.5	8.6	185	25	11.4	10.3	185	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.1	22.3	328	25	18.2	13.1	328	25
High needs	5.1	11.7	154	25	30.1	23.4	154	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.3	14.9	87	25	26.8	18.4	87	25
EL and Former EL	1.9	7.1	70	25	32.7	31.4	70	0
Students w/ disabilities	2.4	5.4	37	25	41.5	18.9	37	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3.2	17.6	34	25	29.0	20.6	34	25
Hispanic/Latino	2.7	7.5	93	25	31.5	23.7	93	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.2	28.6	185	25	10.3	7.0	185	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.0	8.2	110	25	16.0	19.1	110	0
High needs	0.0	3.9	51	25	25.0	33.3	51	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	34	-	-	-	34	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	28	-	-	-	28	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	3.3	14.1	64	25	6.6	7.8	64	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		41.0	44.0	3.0	51.0	No	207	50	Below Target
High needs		40.5	43.5	3.0	51.0	Yes	94	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.5	45.5	7.0	51.0	No	56	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		47.5	48.0	0.5	51.0	Yes	35	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		34.0	33.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	27	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		40.0	42.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	53	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		46.5	46.0	-0.5	51.0	No	123	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		60.0	59.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	208	75	On Target
High needs		54.0	53.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	95	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		59.0	55.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	57	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		63.0	32.0	-31.0	51.0	Yes	35	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		43.5	66.0	22.5	51.0	Yes	27	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.0	45.0	-14.0	51.0	Yes	53	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		62.0	63.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	124	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	64.0	60.0	110.00	25
High needs	64.0	60.0	110.00	25
EL and Former EL	64.0	60.0	110.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	343	342	100	Yes	344	343	100	Yes	116	115	99	Yes
High needs	163	163	100	Yes	164	164	100	Yes	56	56	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	90	90	100	Yes	90	90	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	78	78	100	Yes	79	79	100	Yes	20	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	37	37	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	6	-	-	-	6	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	36	36	100	Yes	36	36	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	102	102	100	Yes	103	103	100	Yes	32	32	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	188	187	99	Yes	188	187	99	Yes	66	65	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.