Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Quarry Hill Community School *closed*
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Quarry Hill Community School
Organization Information
District:Monson (01910000)School type:Elementary School
School:Quarry Hill Community School (01910025)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.8, Target = 90.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 74.8, Target = 90.8 75 or Higher All Students 84.3 73.8 74.8 1.0 90.8 92.2 1512250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 57.7, Target = 86 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 57.7, Target = 86 75 or Higher High needs 76.0 57.0 57.7 0.7 86.0 88.0 24250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 62.9, Target = 63.1 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 62.9, Target = 63.175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 59.7 59.7 62.9 3.2 63.1 79.9 72975On Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 75, Target = 90.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 75, Target = 90.8 75 or Higher White 84.3 74.1 75.0 0.9 90.8 92.2 611050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.8, Target = 88.3 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 73.8, Target = 88.3 75 or Higher All Students 79.9 75.6 73.8 -1.8 88.3 90.0 1312325No Change
High needsCPI = 59.5, Target = 82.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 59.5, Target = 82.9 75 or Higher High needs 70.6 65.7 59.5 -6.2 82.9 85.3 4420Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 61.2, Target = 71.4 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 61.2, Target = 71.4 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 68.8 68.8 61.2 -7.6 71.4 84.4 5290Declined
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
WhiteCPI = 73.6, Target = 88.2 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 73.6, Target = 88.2 75 or Higher White 79.7 75.6 73.6 -2.0 88.2 89.9 611125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.8 2.51220 8.8 13.91220
High needs 0.0 0.0420 23.3 31.0420
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0290 25.0 27.6290
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 5.1 2.71100 8.5 14.51100
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 13.6 16.312325 8.8 15.41230
High needs 9.3 11.94225 14.0 33.3420
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 17.22925 8.3 27.6290
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--2---2-
White 14.5 18.011125 8.5 15.31110
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 38.0 47.5 9.5 51.0No6475On Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 32, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 37.0 32.0 -5.0 51.0No2325Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-2--
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 47, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 35.0 47.0 12.0 51.0No5775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 27, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 27, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 26.0 27.0 1.0 51.0No6450Below Target
High needsSGP = 29, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 29, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 35.0 29.0 -6.0 51.0No230Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-2--
WhiteSGP = 26, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 26, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 26.0 26.0 0.0 51.0Yes5775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01.00-
High needs- 60.01.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.01.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12912698Yes12912798Yes----
High needs464496Yes464496Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged333197Yes333197Yes----
EL and Former EL4---4-------
Students w/ disabilities17---17-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino4---4-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.2---2-------
White11711497Yes11711598Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles