Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Howe-Manning
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Howe-Manning
Organization Information
District:Middleton (01840000)School type:Elementary School
School:Howe-Manning (01840005)Grades served:PK,03,04,05,06
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90, Target = 95.2CPI = 90, Target = 95.2CPI = 90, Target = 95.2 91.8 90.9 90.0 -0.9 95.2 95.9 7039625No Change
High needsCPI = 79.3, Target = 86.1CPI = 79.3, Target = 86.1CPI = 79.3, Target = 86.1 76.2 78.9 79.3 0.4 86.1 88.1 6711550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 89.1, Target = 87.4CPI = 89.1, Target = 87.4CPI = 89.1, Target = 87.4 86.2 86.2 89.1 2.9 87.4 93.1 9539100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.4, Target = 84.5CPI = 74.4, Target = 84.5CPI = 74.4, Target = 84.5 73.4 72.7 74.4 1.7 84.5 86.7 767750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------20--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.8, Target = 95.3CPI = 89.8, Target = 95.3CPI = 89.8, Target = 95.3 91.9 90.8 89.8 -1.0 95.3 96.0 6034625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 94CPI = 94.3, Target = 94 89.7 91.1 94.3 3.2 94.0 94.9 91396100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87, Target = 85.6CPI = 87, Target = 85.6CPI = 87, Target = 85.6 75.3 79.3 87.0 7.7 85.6 87.7 91115100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.5, Target = 82.7CPI = 88.5, Target = 82.7CPI = 88.5, Target = 82.7 81.1 81.1 88.5 7.4 82.7 90.6 9339100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 84.4, Target = 83.5CPI = 84.4, Target = 83.5 71.7 74.7 84.4 9.7 83.5 85.9 957775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------20--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.9, Target = 94CPI = 93.9, Target = 94 89.7 91.4 93.9 2.5 94.0 94.9 8434675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.9, Target = 95.2CPI = 91.9, Target = 95.2CPI = 91.9, Target = 95.2 91.8 91.0 91.9 0.9 95.2 95.9 90105100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.9, Target = 89.4CPI = 84.9, Target = 89.4CPI = 84.9, Target = 89.4 81.9 79.3 84.9 5.6 89.4 91.0 943875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  78.8---- 89.4-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.9, Target = 95.3CPI = 90.9, Target = 95.3CPI = 90.9, Target = 95.3 91.9 90.3 90.9 0.6 95.3 96.0 819175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.2 13.43960 1.9 3.83960
High needs 7.0 5.21150 6.3 10.41150
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.3 5.1390 4.1 2.63925
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities 1.1 3.97725 9.2 14.3770
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--20---20-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.6 12.43460 2.1 4.33460
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 35.5 42.239625 3.3 1.539625
High needs 14.2 17.411525 10.2 5.211525
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.4 30.83925 12.2 5.13925
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities 7.0 7.87725 14.0 7.87725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--20---20-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.2 40.534625 2.7 1.734625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.9 32.41050 1.0 1.01050
High needs 10.3 13.23825 3.4 2.63825
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--29---29-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.7 28.6910 1.1 1.1910
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 44.0 42.0 -2.0 51.0No30650Below Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 34.0 36.0 2.0 51.0No8450Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 37.0 47.0 10.0 51.0Yes2975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 32.5 36.0 3.5 51.0No5950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 44.0 42.0 -2.0 51.0No26950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 50.0 60.0 10.0 51.0Yes304100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 49.0 56.0 7.0 51.0Yes8375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 60.0 56.0 -4.0 51.0Yes2875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-5--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 37.5 55.5 18.0 51.0Yes58100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-12--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 50.0 60.0 10.0 51.0Yes267100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students39839699Yes398397100Yes10710699Yes
High needs11711598Yes11711699Yes403998Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4040100Yes4040100Yes14---
EL and Former EL12---12---2---
Students w/ disabilities787799Yes787799Yes302997Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian20---20---5---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino18---18---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White34734599Yes347346100Yes929199Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles