Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Roosevelt
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Roosevelt
Organization Information
District:Melrose (01780000)School type:Elementary School
School:Roosevelt (01780035)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 92.9 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 95.2, Target = 92.9CPI = 95.2, Target = 92.975 or Higher All Students 87.8 95.1 95.2 0.1 92.9 93.9 95184100Above Target
High needsCPI = 88, Target = 85.4 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 88, Target = 85.4CPI = 88, Target = 85.475 or Higher High needs 75.0 86.0 88.0 2.0 85.4 87.5 9550100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  94.3---- 97.2-26--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities  72.8---- 86.4-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.7, Target = 93.2 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.7, Target = 93.2CPI = 95.7, Target = 93.275 or Higher White 88.3 94.9 95.7 0.8 93.2 94.2 94158100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.5, Target = 91.5 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 92.5, Target = 91.575 or Higher All Students 85.4 91.8 92.5 0.7 91.5 92.7 8218375On Target
High needsCPI = 82.7, Target = 85 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 82.7, Target = 85 75 or Higher High needs 74.2 84.7 82.7 -2.0 85.0 87.1 794925No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged  88.6---- 94.3-26--
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities  73.5---- 86.8-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 92 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 93.8, Target = 92CPI = 93.8, Target = 9275 or Higher White 86.2 91.6 93.8 2.2 92.0 93.1 83157100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.5, Target = 92 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 92.5, Target = 9275 or Higher All Students 86.2 83.0 92.5 9.5 92.0 93.1 9260100Above Target
High needs -------9--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 93.4 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 92.7, Target = 93.475 or Higher White 88.7 81.6 92.7 11.1 93.4 94.4 8755100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.4 27.21840 1.1 1.11840
High needs 9.3 12.05025 4.7 4.05025
Econ. Disadvantaged--26---26-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--26---26-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.6 29.71580 0.6 0.61580
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.7 53.618325 2.7 2.218325
High needs 13.6 34.74925 9.1 6.14925
Econ. Disadvantaged--26---26-
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--25---25-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 46.2 56.115725 2.5 2.51570
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.5 28.36025 5.8 1.76025
High needs--9---9-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.8 29.15525 6.6 1.85525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 71.0 54.5 -16.5 51.0No11275On Target
High needs --- 51.0-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 5175 or Higher White 70.0 56.0 -14.0 51.0Yes9375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 52, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 60.0 52.0 -8.0 51.0Yes11375On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 43, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 65.0 43.0 -22.0 51.0No2350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-12--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 5175 or Higher White 59.0 53.0 -6.0 51.0Yes9475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013.00-
High needs- 60.013.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.013.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18818699Yes18818598Yes6161100Yes
High needs535298Yes535196Yes10---
Econ. Disadvantaged292897Yes292897Yes6---
EL and Former EL10---10---2---
Students w/ disabilities272696Yes272593No4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---3---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---1---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White15915899Yes15915799Yes5555100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles