Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Horace Mann
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Horace Mann
Organization Information
District:Melrose (01780000)School type:Elementary School
School:Horace Mann (01780025)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96, Target = 93.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 96, Target = 93.8CPI = 96, Target = 93.875 or Higher All Students 89.4 94.6 96.0 1.4 93.8 94.7 98125100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.9, Target = 87.6 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 87.9, Target = 87.675 or Higher High needs 78.7 84.5 87.9 3.4 87.6 89.4 953175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.6, Target = 95.2 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96.6, Target = 95.2CPI = 96.6, Target = 95.275 or Higher White 91.8 94.9 96.6 1.7 95.2 95.9 97104100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 89.7 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 95.2, Target = 89.7CPI = 95.2, Target = 89.775 or Higher All Students 82.4 92.2 95.2 3.0 89.7 91.2 94125100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.3, Target = 81.5 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 86.3, Target = 81.5CPI = 86.3, Target = 81.575 or Higher High needs 68.3 81.8 86.3 4.5 81.5 84.2 8931100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.4, Target = 91.4 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.4, Target = 91.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 91.475 or Higher White 85.3 91.8 95.4 3.6 91.4 92.7 92104100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.2, Target = 86.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 80.2, Target = 86.6 75 or Higher All Students 77.0 78.2 80.2 2.0 86.6 88.5 484350Improved Below Target
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.8, Target = 87 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.8, Target = 87 75 or Higher White 77.7 78.0 83.8 5.8 87.0 88.9 443750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.7 34.412525 2.3 0.812525
High needs 2.7 9.73125 8.1 3.23125
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.0 36.510425 2.8 1.010425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 42.6 56.812525 3.1 1.612525
High needs 21.6 19.4310 8.1 3.23125
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 43.0 58.710425 2.8 1.910425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.5 11.64325 8.5 7.04325
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.8 13.53725 9.8 5.43725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 48.5 44.0 -4.5 51.0Yes8075On Target
High needsSGP = 18.5, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 18.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 34.0 18.5 -15.5 51.0Yes2275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-5--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 44, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 44, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 50.0 44.0 -6.0 51.0Yes6475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 69.5 55.5 -14.0 51.0Yes8075On Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 35, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 56.0 35.0 -21.0 51.0Yes2275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 69.5 56.5 -13.0 51.0Yes6475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01.00-
High needs- 60.01.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.01.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12712598Yes12712598Yes4343100Yes
High needs333197Yes333197Yes15---
Econ. Disadvantaged10---10---4---
EL and Former EL1---1-------
Students w/ disabilities23---23---12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---1---
Afr. Amer./Black8---8---3---
Hispanic/Latino4---4-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White10610498Yes10610498Yes3737100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles