Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Medway High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Medway High
Organization Information
District:Medway (01770000)School type:High School
School:Medway High (01770505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.7, Target = 99.2CPI = 99.7, Target = 99.2 98.7 99.7 99.7 0.0 99.2 99.4 90196100Above Target
High needsCPI = 98.5, Target = 95.6CPI = 98.5, Target = 95.6CPI = 98.5, Target = 95.6 92.4- 98.5 1.4 95.6 96.2 8834100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.7, Target = 99.2CPI = 99.7, Target = 99.2 98.7 99.7 99.7 0.0 99.2 99.4 81182100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.6, Target = 98.4CPI = 97.6, Target = 98.4 97.3 98.2 97.6 -0.6 98.4 98.7 87195100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.4, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.4, Target = 93.1CPI = 86.4, Target = 93.1 88.2- 86.4 -0.7 93.1 94.1 683325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.8, Target = 98.4CPI = 97.8, Target = 98.4 97.3 98.2 97.8 -0.4 98.4 98.7 81181100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 96CPI = 94.3, Target = 96CPI = 94.3, Target = 96 93.1 93.2 94.3 1.1 96.0 96.6 6419450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 78.8, Target = 87.5CPI = 78.8, Target = 87.5CPI = 78.8, Target = 87.5 78.6- 78.8 -1.7 87.5 89.3 283325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.6, Target = 96CPI = 94.6, Target = 96CPI = 94.6, Target = 96 93.2 93.2 94.6 1.4 96.0 96.6 5818150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 74.5 70.41960 0.0 0.019625
High needs 40.0 32.4340 0.0 0.03425
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--25---25-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 74.2 70.91820 0.0 0.018225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 78.5 70.31950 1.0 1.01950
High needs 28.6 24.2330 0.0 6.1330
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 79.0 71.81810 1.1 1.11810
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 35.1 30.91940 1.1 1.01940
High needs 6.3 6.1330 0.0 6.1330
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.8 30.91810 1.1 1.11810
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 51.0 64.0 13.0 51.0Yes195100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51 62.0 59.5 -2.5 51.0Yes3475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 50.5 64.0 13.5 51.0Yes181100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 50.0 47.5 -2.5 51.0No15850Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 35.0 39.0 4.0 51.0No2650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 50.5 48.0 -2.5 51.0No14550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 80 95.7 96.2 0.5 80.0 90.0186100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 90.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 90.9, Target = 80 87.2 90.9 3.7 80.0 90.03375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.024--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.03--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.05--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.5, Target = 80 95.6 96.5 0.9 80.0 90.0172100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.3, Target = 85 98.2 96.3 -1.9 85.0 95.0187100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.4, Target = 85 95.7 89.4 -6.3 85.0 95.04775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.034--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 96.2, Target = 85 98.6 96.2 -2.4 85.0 95.0182100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.5, Target = 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.37179325No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 0.8, Target = 0.4 0.7 2.7 0.8 1.9 0.4 0.47412850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------51--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------91--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
Asian -------17--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.36773750Improved Below Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students197197100Yes19719599Yes19719699Yes
High needs3535100Yes353397Yes353497Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged16---16---16---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities2626100Yes26---26---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian3---3---3---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White183183100Yes18318199Yes18318299Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles