Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Old Hammondtown
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Old Hammondtown
Organization Information
District:Mattapoisett (01730000)School type:Elementary School
School:Old Hammondtown (01730010)Grades served:04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.4, Target = 95CPI = 95.4, Target = 95 91.5 92.0 95.4 3.4 95.0 95.8 96225100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.2, Target = 82.4CPI = 87.2, Target = 82.4CPI = 87.2, Target = 82.4 69.8 85.5 87.2 1.7 82.4 84.9 9347100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.7, Target = 88.9CPI = 86.7, Target = 88.9CPI = 86.7, Target = 88.9 87.9 87.9 86.7 -1.2 88.9 94.0 913275On Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities  63.6---- 81.8-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.2, Target = 95.5CPI = 96.2, Target = 95.5 92.2 92.3 96.2 3.9 95.5 96.1 96202100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.7, Target = 93.3CPI = 94.7, Target = 93.3CPI = 94.7, Target = 93.3 88.5 91.8 94.7 2.9 93.3 94.3 93223100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.4, Target = 81.2CPI = 86.4, Target = 81.2CPI = 86.4, Target = 81.2 67.7 81.4 86.4 5.0 81.2 83.9 9046100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.7, Target = 85.9CPI = 88.7, Target = 85.9CPI = 88.7, Target = 85.9 84.6 84.6 88.7 4.1 85.9 92.3 9431100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80, Target = 76.7CPI = 80, Target = 76.7CPI = 80, Target = 76.7 60.0 72.0 80.0 8.0 76.7 80.0 8825--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.8, Target = 93.6CPI = 95.8, Target = 93.6CPI = 95.8, Target = 93.6 89.1 92.3 95.8 3.5 93.6 94.6 94201100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 92.8CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.8CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.8 87.7 90.3 90.6 0.3 92.8 93.9 867275On Target
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.5, Target = 93.5CPI = 91.5, Target = 93.5CPI = 91.5, Target = 93.5 88.8 92.7 91.5 -1.2 93.5 94.4 836575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.9 35.122525 2.2 0.922525
High needs 2.0 6.44725 4.0 4.3470
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.0 6.33225 0.0 6.3320
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--26---26-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.8 37.620225 1.4 0.520225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.6 52.522325 1.3 1.82230
High needs 9.8 19.64625 3.9 6.5460
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.7 22.63125 0.0 9.7310
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 4.0 4.025- 8.0 12.025-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.4 54.720125 1.4 1.020125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.8 23.67225 1.3 2.8720
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.4 24.66525 0.0 1.5650
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 81, Target = 51SGP = 81, Target = 51SGP = 81, Target = 51 44.0 81.0 37.0 51.0Yes215100Above Target
High needsSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 45.0 72.0 27.0 51.0Yes41100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 43.5 69.0 25.5 51.0Yes26100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 82, Target = 51SGP = 82, Target = 51SGP = 82, Target = 51 44.0 82.0 38.0 51.0Yes194100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 84, Target = 51SGP = 84, Target = 51SGP = 84, Target = 51 70.0 84.0 14.0 51.0Yes214100Above Target
High needsSGP = 83, Target = 51SGP = 83, Target = 51SGP = 83, Target = 51 61.5 83.0 21.5 51.0Yes41100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 83.5, Target = 51SGP = 83.5, Target = 51SGP = 83.5, Target = 51 56.0 83.5 27.5 51.0Yes26100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 85, Target = 51SGP = 85, Target = 51SGP = 85, Target = 51 69.0 85.0 16.0 51.0Yes193100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students23322898Yes23322797Yes747399Yes
High needs504896Yes504896Yes17---
Econ. Disadvantaged3434100Yes343397Yes10---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities272696Yes272596Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---1---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---1---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White20820498Yes20820398Yes676699Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles