Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Martinson Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Martinson Elementary
Organization Information
District:Marshfield (01710000)School type:Elementary School
School:Martinson Elementary (01710025)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.3, Target = 96.2CPI = 92.3, Target = 96.2CPI = 92.3, Target = 96.2 93.4 93.1 92.3 -0.8 96.2 96.7 8020575On Target
High needsCPI = 79.5, Target = 89.6CPI = 79.5, Target = 89.6CPI = 79.5, Target = 89.6 82.2 80.2 79.5 -0.7 89.6 91.1 685625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.6, Target = 84CPI = 82.6, Target = 84CPI = 82.6, Target = 84 82.5 82.5 82.6 0.1 84.0 91.3 783650Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.9, Target = 86.6CPI = 71.9, Target = 86.6CPI = 71.9, Target = 86.6 77.0 71.8 71.9 0.1 86.6 88.5 703250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.1, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.1, Target = 96.3CPI = 92.1, Target = 96.3 93.7 93.1 92.1 -1.0 96.3 96.9 7318625No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.1, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.2 91.7 92.7 92.1 -0.6 95.2 95.9 8020575On Target
High needsCPI = 82.1, Target = 86.5CPI = 82.1, Target = 86.5CPI = 82.1, Target = 86.5 76.8 81.6 82.1 0.5 86.5 88.4 765650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.1, Target = 83.2CPI = 86.1, Target = 83.2CPI = 86.1, Target = 83.2 81.7 81.7 86.1 4.4 83.2 90.9 8836100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.8, Target = 83.1CPI = 75.8, Target = 83.1CPI = 75.8, Target = 83.1 71.0 75.0 75.8 0.8 83.1 85.5 793250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------3--
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 95.3CPI = 92.7, Target = 95.3CPI = 92.7, Target = 95.3 92.0 93.0 92.7 -0.3 95.3 96.0 7918675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.6, Target = 95.3CPI = 89.6, Target = 95.3CPI = 89.6, Target = 95.3 91.9 89.1 89.6 0.5 95.3 96.0 827275On Target
High needs -------17--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.9, Target = 95.6CPI = 89.9, Target = 95.6CPI = 89.9, Target = 95.6 92.4 89.1 89.9 0.8 95.6 96.2 756775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.3 22.02050 2.3 2.020525
High needs 13.2 8.9560 9.4 5.45625
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.0 13.9360 10.0 2.83625
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 3.2 0.0320 16.1 9.43225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--3---3-
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.7 21.51860 2.4 2.21860
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.8 37.12050 3.1 2.420525
High needs 30.2 21.4560 13.2 8.95625
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.0 27.8360 16.7 5.63625
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 16.1 12.5320 19.4 12.53225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--3---3-
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.5 37.61860 2.9 2.218625
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.4 36.17225 3.2 1.47225
High needs--17---17-
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.0 37.36725 3.4 1.56725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 61.5 62.0 0.5 51.0No128100Above Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 56.0 43.0 -13.0 51.0No2750Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 65.0 61.5 -3.5 51.0No118100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 50.0 49.0 -1.0 51.0No12950Below Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 63.0 54.0 -9.0 51.0No2875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 54.0 51.0 -3.0 51.0No11975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.011-
High needs- 60.011-
EL and Former EL- 60.011-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students21821699Yes21821599Yes777597Yes
High needs666497Yes666395Yes22---
Econ. Disadvantaged444398Yes444295Yes16---
EL and Former EL10---10---2---
Students w/ disabilities353497Yes353497Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.3---3-------
Asian8---8---3---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19419299Yes19419198Yes706999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles