Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gov Edward Winslow
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Gov Edward Winslow
Organization Information
District:Marshfield (01710000)School type:Elementary School
School:Gov Edward Winslow (01710020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.8, Target = 96.9CPI = 93.8, Target = 96.9CPI = 93.8, Target = 96.9 94.7 92.5 93.8 1.3 96.9 97.4 8823775On Target
High needsCPI = 84.2, Target = 92.5CPI = 84.2, Target = 92.5CPI = 84.2, Target = 92.5 87.1 79.6 84.2 4.6 92.5 93.6 855750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90.2, Target = 88.2CPI = 90.2, Target = 88.2CPI = 90.2, Target = 88.2 87.1 87.1 90.2 3.1 88.2 93.6 9733100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 88.2CPI = 75, Target = 88.2CPI = 75, Target = 88.2 79.7 67.0 75.0 8.0 88.2 89.9 773350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.1, Target = 96.9CPI = 94.1, Target = 96.9CPI = 94.1, Target = 96.9 94.7 92.5 94.1 1.6 96.9 97.4 85227100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 94.1CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.1CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.1 89.8 91.3 92.7 1.4 94.1 94.9 8323775On Target
High needsCPI = 82.5, Target = 86.6CPI = 82.5, Target = 86.6CPI = 82.5, Target = 86.6 77.0 82.1 82.5 0.4 86.6 88.5 785750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 91.7, Target = 88.2CPI = 91.7, Target = 88.2CPI = 91.7, Target = 88.2 87.1 87.1 91.7 4.6 88.2 93.6 9733100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.5, Target = 80.7CPI = 73.5, Target = 80.7CPI = 73.5, Target = 80.7 66.9 75.0 73.5 -1.5 80.7 83.5 743325No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93, Target = 94CPI = 93, Target = 94 89.7 91.0 93.0 2.0 94.0 94.9 8022775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.2, Target = 93.1CPI = 89.2, Target = 93.1CPI = 89.2, Target = 93.1 88.1 92.7 89.2 -3.5 93.1 94.1 818175On Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.4, Target = 93CPI = 89.4, Target = 93CPI = 89.4, Target = 93 88.0 92.4 89.4 -3.0 93.0 94.0 727875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.9 25.32370 2.7 1.723725
High needs 10.2 12.35725 12.2 7.05725
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.8 21.23325 6.9 0.03325
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 3.6 0.0330 21.4 12.13325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.0 24.72270 2.8 1.322725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.0 44.72370 3.2 2.123725
High needs 26.5 24.6570 12.2 7.05725
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.4 36.4330 10.3 0.03325
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 10.7 9.1330 17.9 12.13325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 44.9 44.52270 3.3 1.822725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.4 28.4810 1.3 2.5810
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.3 26.9780 1.3 2.6780
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 57.0 65.0 8.0 51.0Yes148100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 38.0 64.5 26.5 51.0Yes34100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 57.5 64.5 7.0 51.0Yes142100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 59.0 61.0 2.0 51.0Yes148100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 50.0 57.5 7.5 51.0No3475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 51 59.0 60.5 1.5 51.0Yes142100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students241240100Yes242241100Yes8282100Yes
High needs605998Yes616098Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged3333100Yes3434100Yes11---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities363597Yes373697Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White230229100Yes231230100Yes7979100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles