Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Sippican
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Sippican
Organization Information
District:Marion (01690000)School type:Elementary School
School:Sippican (01690005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.7, Target = 94.8CPI = 90.7, Target = 94.8CPI = 90.7, Target = 94.8 91.0 92.0 90.7 -1.3 94.8 95.5 7326525No Change
High needsCPI = 80.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 80.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 80.2, Target = 85.4 75.0 82.4 80.2 -2.2 85.4 87.5 719125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.1, Target = 89.6CPI = 82.1, Target = 89.6CPI = 82.1, Target = 89.6 88.6 88.6 82.1 -6.5 89.6 94.3 75530Declined
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 82.6CPI = 75, Target = 82.6CPI = 75, Target = 82.6 70.2 76.0 75.0 -1.0 82.6 85.1 774625No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.3, Target = 94.8CPI = 91.3, Target = 94.8CPI = 91.3, Target = 94.8 91.1 92.4 91.3 -1.1 94.8 95.6 6923325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.3, Target = 92.9CPI = 92.3, Target = 92.9 87.8 91.4 92.3 0.9 92.9 93.9 8126575On Target
High needsCPI = 84.1, Target = 81.9CPI = 84.1, Target = 81.9CPI = 84.1, Target = 81.9 68.9 81.1 84.1 3.0 81.9 84.5 8391100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.3, Target = 88.2CPI = 87.3, Target = 88.2 87.1 87.1 87.3 0.2 88.2 93.6 915375On Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.3, Target = 79.2CPI = 78.3, Target = 79.2 64.3 74.5 78.3 3.8 79.2 82.2 844675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 92.5, Target = 93.2 88.4 91.3 92.5 1.2 93.2 94.2 7723375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 91.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 91.7, Target = 92.8 87.7 86.5 91.7 5.2 92.8 93.9 896375On Target
High needs  79.3---- 89.7-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.6, Target = 92.6CPI = 92.6, Target = 92.6 87.3 86.4 92.6 6.2 92.6 93.7 8754100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.4 17.02650 3.1 3.02650
High needs 5.1 6.69125 9.0 8.8910
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.1 7.55325 0.0 7.5530
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 4.2 6.54625 14.6 13.04625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.0 17.22330 3.1 2.623325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.1 49.126525 4.3 4.52650
High needs 12.8 27.59125 14.1 13.2910
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.2 32.15325 9.1 11.3530
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 6.3 19.64625 20.8 19.6460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 40.7 50.623325 4.4 4.72330
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.5 25.46325 5.3 0.06325
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.3 24.15425 5.7 0.05425
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 43.0 42.0 -1.0 51.0No18450Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 37.0 34.0 -3.0 51.0No5625Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-30--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51SGP = 32.5, Target = 51 30.5 32.5 2.0 51.0No2650Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 43.0 42.0 -1.0 51.0No16150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 42.5 57.0 14.5 51.0Yes184100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 35.5 57.0 21.5 51.0Yes56100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-30--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 33.0 51.5 18.5 51.0Yes26100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 46.5 57.0 10.5 51.0Yes16175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students26926599Yes26926599Yes656397Yes
High needs949197Yes949197Yes212095Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged545398Yes545398Yes11---
EL and Former EL4---4---2---
Students w/ disabilities494697Yes494697Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---3---
Afr. Amer./Black8---8---1---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White23623399Yes23623399Yes555498Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles