Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Wolf Swamp Road

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Wolf Swamp Road

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.5, Target = 92.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91.5, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher All Students 87.6 88.4 91.5 3.1 92.8 93.8 7718550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 83.5, Target = 84.8 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 83.5, Target = 84.8 75 or Higher High needs 73.9 74.5 83.5 9.0 84.8 87.0 835650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  81.0---- 90.5-26--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.4, Target = 83.8 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 78.4, Target = 83.8 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 72.3 70.0 78.4 8.4 83.8 86.2 863750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.5, Target = 92.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.5, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher White 87.7 89.7 91.5 1.8 92.8 93.9 7013350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 92.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91, Target = 92.6 75 or Higher All Students 87.3 88.4 91.0 2.6 92.6 93.7 7618650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.5, Target = 86.1 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 79.5, Target = 86.1 75 or Higher High needs 76.1 74.5 79.5 5.0 86.1 88.1 665650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  78.6---- 89.3-26--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.3, Target = 85.4 - Students w/ disabilities75 or Higher Students w/ disabilitiesStudents w/ disabilities CPI = 74.3, Target = 85.4 75 or Higher Students w/ disabilities 75.0 67.4 74.3 6.9 85.4 87.5 763750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------22--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.4, Target = 92.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.4, Target = 92.7 75 or Higher White 87.4 89.2 91.4 2.2 92.7 93.7 7213450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.8, Target = 91.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 77.8, Target = 91.6 75 or Higher All Students 85.6 81.8 77.8 -4.0 91.6 92.8 40630Declined
High needs  67.0---- 83.5-21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------9--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.7, Target = 91.3 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 77.7, Target = 91.3 75 or Higher White 85.1 83.8 77.7 -6.1 91.3 92.6 23470Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.0 20.518525 3.2 1.118525
High needs 3.8 7.15625 9.6 3.65625
Econ. Disadvantaged--26---26-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0370 14.3 5.43725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.5 18.813325 2.9 0.013325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 33.7 40.918625 3.7 2.718625
High needs 18.9 19.6560 11.3 7.15625
Econ. Disadvantaged--26---26-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 11.1 10.8370 13.9 10.83725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--22---22-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--16---16-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.7 38.813425 2.9 2.213425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 12.1 15.96325 4.5 4.8630
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--9---9-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.0 14.94725 1.9 4.3470
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 50.5 68.5 18.0 51.0Yes118100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60.5, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 60.5, Target = 51SGP = 60.5, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 39.0 60.5 21.5 51.0Yes36100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 52.0 63.5 11.5 51.0No84100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 47.5 67.5 20.0 51.0Yes120100Above Target
High needsSGP = 66.5, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 48.0 66.5 18.5 51.0No36100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-14--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 47.0 66.5 19.5 51.0No86100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05.00-
High needs- 60.05.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.05.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19119099Yes191191100Yes6666100Yes
High needs6060100Yes6060100Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2929100Yes2929100Yes11---
EL and Former EL10---10---4---
Students w/ disabilities3737100Yes3737100Yes14---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian24---24---9---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---3---
Hispanic/Latino17---17---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13613599Yes136136100Yes4848100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles