Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Glenbrook Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Glenbrook Middle

Organization Information
District:Longmeadow (01590000)School type:Middle School
School:Glenbrook Middle (01590017)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96, Target = 98.5CPI = 96, Target = 98.5CPI = 96, Target = 98.5 97.4 95.4 96.0 0.6 98.5 98.7 8732275On Target
High needsCPI = 87.3, Target = 94.1CPI = 87.3, Target = 94.1CPI = 87.3, Target = 94.1 89.9 83.8 87.3 3.5 94.1 95.0 877950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  85.4---- 92.7-25--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 85.3, Target = 93.1CPI = 85.3, Target = 93.1CPI = 85.3, Target = 93.1 88.2 81.5 85.3 3.8 93.1 94.1 895650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 91.7, Target = 99.1CPI = 91.7, Target = 99.1CPI = 91.7, Target = 99.1 98.8 95.0 91.7 -3.3 99.1 99.4 21300Declined
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.8, Target = 98.5CPI = 96.8, Target = 98.5CPI = 96.8, Target = 98.5 97.4 95.7 96.8 1.1 98.5 98.7 87258100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 83.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 83.8, Target = 93.5 88.8 90.7 83.8 -6.9 93.5 94.4 673230Declined
High needsCPI = 61.3, Target = 83CPI = 61.3, Target = 83CPI = 61.3, Target = 83 70.9 72.2 61.3 -10.9 83.0 85.5 40800Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  77.1---- 88.6-25--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 53.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 53.1, Target = 80.9 67.3 66.7 53.1 -13.6 80.9 83.7 61570Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 89.2, Target = 98.1CPI = 89.2, Target = 98.1CPI = 89.2, Target = 98.1 97.5 92.5 89.2 -3.3 98.1 98.8 343075On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.6, Target = 93.6CPI = 83.6, Target = 93.6CPI = 83.6, Target = 93.6 89.0 91.2 83.6 -7.6 93.6 94.5 562580Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.2, Target = 92.5CPI = 88.2, Target = 92.5CPI = 88.2, Target = 92.5 87.2 90.3 88.2 -2.1 92.5 93.6 93114100Above Target
High needsCPI = 77, Target = 87.4CPI = 77, Target = 87.4CPI = 77, Target = 87.4 78.4- 77.0 8.7 87.4 89.2 972575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 86.2, Target = 92.6CPI = 86.2, Target = 92.6 87.3 90.4 86.2 -4.2 92.6 93.7 858975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.9 32.932225 1.7 2.53220
High needs 5.6 7.67925 7.0 8.9790
Econ. Disadvantaged--25---25-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 5.6 1.8560 7.4 10.7560
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 30.0 50.03025 3.3 6.7300
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.3 32.225825 1.7 1.62580
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 43.0 31.03230 5.1 8.03230
High needs 15.5 8.8800 21.1 28.8800
Econ. Disadvantaged--25---25-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 7.4 5.3570 25.9 36.8570
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 56.7 53.3300 6.7 6.7300
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.8 28.72580 3.8 8.12580
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 12.5 14.911425 4.5 2.611425
High needs 6.7 8.02525 13.3 12.0250
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.5 12.4890 5.1 2.28925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 55.0 66.5 11.5 51.0Yes306100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 42.5 64.0 21.5 51.0Yes71100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 46.5 63.0 16.5 51.0Yes49100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 79, Target = 51SGP = 79, Target = 51SGP = 79, Target = 51 47.0 79.0 32.0 51.0No29100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 55.5 63.5 8.0 51.0Yes246100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 65.0 35.0 -30.0 51.0No30625Below Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 58.0 35.0 -23.0 51.0No7125Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 62.0 42.0 -20.0 51.0No4950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 77.0 50.0 -27.0 51.0No2950Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 64.0 33.0 -31.0 51.0No24525Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students326325100Yes330330100Yes115115100Yes
High needs807999Yes8080100Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2525100Yes2525100Yes8---
EL and Former EL7---7---2---
Students w/ disabilities575698Yes5757100Yes18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian3131100Yes3131100Yes15---
Afr. Amer./Black9---9---1---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White260260100Yes264264100Yes9090100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles