Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Littleton Middle School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Littleton Middle School
Organization Information
District:Littleton (01580000)School type:Middle School
School:Littleton Middle School (01580305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.1, Target = 97.9CPI = 94.1, Target = 97.9CPI = 94.1, Target = 97.9 96.4 92.2 94.1 1.9 97.9 98.2 7334950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 81.8, Target = 90.1CPI = 81.8, Target = 90.1CPI = 81.8, Target = 90.1 83.1 76.8 81.8 5.0 90.1 91.6 608850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  79.5---- 89.8-31--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.3, Target = 90.1CPI = 78.3, Target = 90.1CPI = 78.3, Target = 90.1 83.1 75.0 78.3 3.3 90.1 91.6 786950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------19--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 94.1, Target = 98CPI = 94.1, Target = 98CPI = 94.1, Target = 98 96.5 92.2 94.1 1.9 98.0 98.3 6431250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.6, Target = 90.2CPI = 84.6, Target = 90.2CPI = 84.6, Target = 90.2 83.2 83.0 84.6 1.6 90.2 91.6 6934850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.5, Target = 75.3CPI = 62.5, Target = 75.3CPI = 62.5, Target = 75.3 57.7 59.8 62.5 2.7 75.3 78.9 478850Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged  65.9---- 83.0-31--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.2, Target = 75.6CPI = 57.2, Target = 75.6CPI = 57.2, Target = 75.6 58.1 56.4 57.2 0.8 75.6 79.1 736950Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------19--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 84.1, Target = 90.5CPI = 84.1, Target = 90.5CPI = 84.1, Target = 90.5 83.7 82.6 84.1 1.5 90.5 91.9 6031150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.5, Target = 91.5CPI = 84.5, Target = 91.5CPI = 84.5, Target = 91.5 85.5 87.2 84.5 -2.7 91.5 92.8 8512975On Target
High needsCPI = 62.9, Target = 76.7CPI = 62.9, Target = 76.7CPI = 62.9, Target = 76.7 60.0 72.6 62.9 -9.7 76.7 80.0 59310Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.3, Target = 76.7CPI = 57.3, Target = 76.7CPI = 57.3, Target = 76.7 60.0 70.7 57.3 -13.4 76.7 80.0 69240Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 85, Target = 91.7CPI = 85, Target = 91.7CPI = 85, Target = 91.7 85.7 87.4 85.0 -2.4 91.7 92.9 8111875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.0 19.834925 2.5 2.33490
High needs 2.1 4.58825 8.4 9.1880
Econ. Disadvantaged--31---31-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 2.4 1.4690 8.4 11.6690
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--19---19-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 15.4 18.631225 2.5 2.63120
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.9 29.03480 8.4 7.83480
High needs 2.1 11.48825 28.7 27.3880
Econ. Disadvantaged--31---31-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 1.2 5.86925 31.7 34.8690
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--19---19-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 25.7 28.03110 8.3 7.73110
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.3 7.81290 2.8 5.41290
High needs 0.0 3.23125 6.5 22.6310
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.22425 6.9 25.0240
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 6.9 7.611825 3.0 4.21180
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 40.0 55.0 15.0 51.0Yes338100Above Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 38.0 50.0 12.0 51.0Yes8675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-31--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 38.0 52.0 14.0 51.0Yes6775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-17--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 40.0 55.0 15.0 51.0Yes305100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 45.0 42.0 -3.0 51.0No34150Below Target
High needsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 42.0 44.5 2.5 51.0No8650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-31--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 40.0 49.0 9.0 51.0No6750Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-17--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 45.5 43.0 -2.5 51.0No30850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students35435299Yes35635399Yes13113099Yes
High needs908898Yes908898Yes323197Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3131100Yes3131100Yes10---
EL and Former EL3---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities716997Yes716997Yes252496Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian21---21---4---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White313312100Yes31331199Yes118118100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles